Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents

Typical Stepfamilies are Not
Like Intact Biofamilies!


A Summary of 35 Structural Differences

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW
Member, NSRC Experts Council

scales

colorbar

  • home > overview > site map, directory, or search > Q&A, Project 3 links, Solutions article, or other page > here

The Web address of this article is http://sfhelp.org/03/compare.htm

        Clicking links below will open an informational popup or a full window, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit site.        

         This is one of over 150 articles focused on building high-nurturance family relationships and preventing divorce. This introduction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make.

        These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help. The "/" in re/marriage and re/divorce notes that it may be a stepparent's first union. "Co-parents" means both bioparents, or any of the three or more related stepparents and bioparents co-managing a multi-home nuclear stepfamily. 

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

 What's the Problem?

       Co-parents about to re/marry and other non-steppeople often assume that average stepfamilies and intact biofamilies are "fairly similar." Paradoxically, both family types do have similarities - and also differ in over 60 ways. Neither family type is better - they're different. I

        t's vital for courting and committed stepfamily mates and their relatives, friends, and professional supporters, to understand just how different stepfamilies are, so everyone can form realistic expectations. Many traditional intact-biofamily norms don't work well in normal multi-home stepfamilies!

       This is one of a series of articles that describe Project 3 for stepfamily adults and supporters. This Project involves family adults (specially co-parents)...

  • accepting their stepfamily identity, ("Yes, we are a normal multi-home stepfamily"), and studying stepfamily basics;

  • agreeing on who belongs to their multi-generational stepfamily, and...

  • learning how to avoid and resolve significant membership (inclusion/exclusion) conflicts.

        This article summarizes 35 biofamily - stepfamily structural (vs. dynamic) differences. Together, these differences promote ~30 unique family-adjustment tasks that most biopeople don't face. A companion article summarizes how average stepfamilies are like typical intact biofamilies. Option - before reading further, see how many structural differences you can name...

  Structural Stepfamily-Biofamily Differences

        "Structure" here refers to the elements that make a family. "Dynamics" refer to how these family elements interact. Typical co-parents need learn about and work together at a mix of concurrent biofamily-merger tasks, to meld and stabilize their three or more biofamilies over some years. 

        Average extended (multi-generational) stepfamilies differ more in structure from intact biofamilies than adoptive, foster, and same-gender families.

        In reviewing the following summary, note the significance of individual differences, and the collective impact of all of them on stepfamily adults and kids. Follow the links for more detail on any difference, after scanning the whole table.

        If you're not interested in individual differences, the point of listing them all is to document how different typical stepfamily structures are - which is a key reason typical biofamily norms and expectations are often not applicable to stepfamily life.  

Structural Element 

Typical Nuclear Stepfamily 

Typical Intact Biofamily 

1) Number of co-parenting homes Usually two or more homes linked by legal  documents, emotions, finances, genes,  ancestry, shared history, responsibilities, and memories Usually one nuclear home 
2)  Children born prior to a co-parent choosing a (new) mate One to six+  minor and/or grown kids (his and/or hers)  Usually none
3)  Number of active co-parenting adults three or more: you and me, your and my ex mates, and (maybe) their new mate/s One or two co-parents
4)  Number of absent bioparents One or more (if a co-parent has kids with several prior mates), living or dead Usually none, unless jailed, traveling extensively, or at war
5)  Grandparents (living and dead) Six to 12 Usually four
6)  Co-parenting ex mates, and their genetic and legal relatives One or more sets None
7)  Half sibling/s ("ours" kids) Possible None
8)  Resident and/or visiting minor kids; number of stepchildren More: typically 2 to 6  stepkids + (maybe) 1 or more "ours" kids Less: usually 1 to 6 biokids; no stepkids or half-siblings
9)  Physical and legal biochild custody Sole, joint, or split; usually subject to legal decree/s and parenting agreements; often legally contested Shared; usually no legal suits or decrees
10)  Family size and complexity Bigger, more complex: typically 50 to 100+ genetic and legal mem-bers; often from different cultures Smaller, simpler: typically under 50 genetic and legal members (inlaws)
11)  Family variations (types) Almost 100,  considering co- parents' death, divorce, marriage, parenting, and custody variations; Result: "No one's like us - we're alone" One ("traditional"): mom, dad + biokid/s; much more social normalcy, empathy, and support
12)  Adults' ages at (re)marriage Older: typically 30-45+; wider age differences; more life experience; partners may be more mature Younger: typically 18-30; smaller age differences, less experience, less mature
13)  Mates' prior family rules and rituals (e.g. "who carves the turkey in this home?") three or more sets: each mates' birth-family, first marriage family, and absent-parent family/s Usually two sets (each spouse's birth family)
14)  Mementos of mates' prior union/s, and their kids' biofamily life Many emotionally-loaded, tangible and abstract reminders None
15)  Major personal tangible and abstract losses (broken bonds) to mourn Many: from divorce and re/ marriage and cohabiting; for kids, parents, and close relatives; many losses are involuntary Far fewer due to marriage. More losses are intentional choices
16)  Spouses' parenting values and styles (e.g. child discipline) Pre-formed before re/wedding and cohabiting; They often conflict and need compromising Evolved together over years; differences are usually less stressful
17)  Family communication and problem-solving styles and skills Pre-formed; both intra and inter-household style-conflicts are likely; compromises needed Evolved together over years

        This is a LOT to digest, isn't it? We're about half done with 35 common structural differences between typical stepfamilies and intact biofamilies. Do you need a stretch or refreshment break before continuing?

Structural  Element

Typical Stepfamily

Typical Intact Biofamily

18)  Possible "outsider" family- interference or support More interference: ex-mate/s + their new partners (if any); + courts; + bio and step relatives Less: bioparent/s and relatives
19)  Prior adult and child divorce experiences Usual (~90%) on one or both "sides" of the new stepfamily, unless prior mate/s died None; a co-parent's parents or siblings may have been divorced
20)  Caregivers' legal parenting rights and responsibilities re minor kids' school / health / custody / etc. (varies by State) Fewer and less clear rights (step-parents and step-grandparents); responsibilities are more confu-sing; A legal parenting agreement may exist which excludes any step-parents More and clearer rights (bio-parents and bio-grandparents); re-sponsibilities far clearer. No legal documents to negotiate, enforce, or litigate
21)  Prenuptial legal agreement/s about asset and debt ownership if mates (re)divorce More common; symbolizes the real possibility of re/divorce; Can pro-mote major loyalty conflicts Uncommon unless one or both spouse/ are very wealthy
22)  Folklore / social image / common descriptive adjectives More negative image: deficit- based; "blended" / "wicked (step-moms)" / second best / "unreal" / "unnatural," / "minority" / "non- traditional" / abnormal More positive image: intact biofamilies are "regular" / "normal" / "natural" / "real" (family) / "traditional"
23)  Marital (a) experience and doubts, and (b) commitment and hope More experience and realism, so more doubts probable - specially if there were prior divorce/s; Commit-ment may be higher More idealism, fewer doubts; commitment (usually) high, unless marrying because of duty (responsibility), guilt, or fear
24)  Incest taboo: Odds of sexual abuse or inappropriate intra-family attractions or actions Higher odds; attractions may occur between stepparent and stepchild, and/or (teen) stepsibs Lower odds; the incest taboo seems to grow from family mem-bers living together since kids' infancy
25)  Adults' and kids' three-gener-ational family roles  (Mom / step-mom / uncle / step-cousin / half-sib / etc.) Up to 30 roles; less role clarity: norms learned "on the job" - few social guides; role stress (anxiety / overwhelm) more likely Up to 15 family roles; norms widespread, learned over years since childhood; many social guides
26)  Co-parents' self-confidence in, and authority to, discipline minor kids Initially unequal: stepparents may (vs. will) earn authority over time; Discipline values and styles existed before commitment vows, and often conflict Usually equal, if both parents wish; discipline styles and values evolve over years together
27)  Last Names Re-wedded biomom's last names may differ from their kids'; Without adoption, typical stepsibs have different last names Adults and kids usually all have the same last name, so less chance of identity and loyalty (priority) confusions
28)  First names Higher odds two people will have the same name - e.g. two co-parents, or "his" and "her" Sarahs; can be confusing! Usually different, unless parents name a child after one of them or a relative - e.g. "Michael Jr."
29)  Minor or grown child/ren's presence (resident and/or visiting) More stressful; this is the most commonly quoted surface reason for stepfamily stress and re/divorce. The next is money. Less stressful; kids presence usually strengthens bioparents' bond and spousal commitment

Structural Element

Typical Stepfamily

Typical Intact Biofamily

30)  (Three-generational ) members' definitions of "who belongs to my family?" Less clear: definitions usually differ in and between linked stepfamily homes, causing confusions and inclusion/ exclusion conflicts Definitions are clearer and more consistent: major membership disagreements are less common
31)  Family-member loyalty, bonding, and cohesion Initially, pseudo (pretended) or little among merging families; may or may not improve with time; significantly more fragile Generally much stronger throughout the family life-cycle; they usually transcend personal and family traumas
32)  Financial (a) assets, (real estate, trusts, insurance policies, savings accounts, investments...), (b) debts, (c) ownership, and (d) allocations  Usually more assets, owned by more people. Ownership and allocation conflicts are more common. ("Should I help pay for your child's school expenses?")  Fewer assets and debts. Ownership is usually joint and uncontested, unless divorcing. Allocation conflicts can occur as the family matures.
33)  Family nurturance level during  co-parents' childhood Theory: higher odds of major trauma (e.g. emotional / spiritual deprivations, abuses, and neglect)  for both mates. If true, this is often denied to one's self and others Theory: lower odds of low family nurturance and psychological wounds, unless the family is chronically troubled.
34)  Family nurturance level now - how often adults and kids get most of their primary needs met well enough: Probably lower, because of more people, conflicts, and adjustment needs, and the complexity of stepfamily mergers. Probably higher on average, because there are fewer people, conflicts, and family-adjustment needs and losses.
35)  Human-service professionals' accurate knowledge of basic family norms, traits, realities, stressors, and dynamics Lower. Most legal, media, clergy, education, and counseling professionals have no informed stepfamily training. Common error: "stepfamilies are pretty much like biofamilies" Higher: Clergy, doctors, family lawyers and judges, educators, counselors, and their supervisors are more often trained and experienced in biofamily norms and dynamics

       Many of these structural family differences generate stepfamily-unique adjustment tasks. These are often...

  • concurrent,

  • recurring (e.g. if "the other" ex remarries), and...

  • add to "normal" personal, home, and family life tasks.

        Typical courting and newly-committed partners and their supporters aren't expecting or prepared for these adjustment tasks. This causes significant stress in and between family homes, until co-parents learn "what's normal" by trial and error, and correct their expectations. This often takes four or more years after committing and cohabiting, as co-parents slowly merge their several multi-generational biofamilies.

        Pause. breathe, and reflect - what are you thinking and feeling now? What did you just learn? Is there someone else you feel should study and discuss these 35 structural differences?

+ + +

Continue this comparison by reviewing the ~ 30 task differences between average stepfamilies and intact biofamilies.

<<  This article was very helpful  somewhat helpful  not helpful   >>  

<<   Prior page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  December 28, 2008