Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents


What's Normal In a Stepfamily?

Realities 22 - 32 of 60

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW
Member, NSRC Expert Council

colorbar

  • home > overview > site map, directory, or search > Q&A, Solutions article, or prior page > myths > expectations > here

    The Web address of this 8-page article is http://sfhelp.org/04/myths.htm

            Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit site

           This is the third of five pages summarizing typical stepfamily realities. See the directions and background on page 1. Before reading this page, recall why you're doing so. What do you need?

 Here's What's (Usually) REAL (continued)

[ Myths 22 - 24 ]  Many well-meaning stepparents and relatives - specially some idealistic and religiously-devout people - believe "New stepparents should (immediately) care about their stepchild/ren as much as their own."

        Even if a stepparent entered the picture when their stepchild was, say, under six years old, many stepparents feel guilty about favoring their own child/ren, nieces, and nephews at first. This can be specially true if their biokids are teens.

        Besides their genetic and ancestral ties, bioparents have shared life experiences with their own children for years. They've usually spent much less time with their stepchild/ren. To discern your reality, answer this honestly: "If our house was burning, which kids would you or I save first?" Usually blood is instinctively thicker than water! A rose doesn't have to apologize for not being an orchid...

        Typical stepparents and stepkin may genuinely feel equal concern for biological and step kids, after a long (e.g. five or more years) pre-re/marriage friendship or custodial stepfamily history. Otherwise, the reality to accept without guilt is: "I love my (bio)kids more (or differently) than yours so far, and that's natural and OK!"

        Incidentally, if a stepparent is childless, the birth of an "ours" child may activate this "mandatory fairness" myth well after exchanging commitment vows.

        Kids naturally test and re-test their power and their family status by angrily complaining to either bio or stepparent "You're not fair - you treat (my stepsib/s) better than me!" One co-parent usually has a more relaxed disciplinary style than their new mate - specially if they're still guilty over earlier divorce trauma and/or they're a previously-overloaded single parent.

        Treating all children in your stepfamily the same is a worthy goal, but to expect to do so soon after cohabiting is often unrealistic, divisive, and stressful. An option is to honestly tell the kids something like:

"We're working hard to be fairer. Our rules have been pretty different than (the other family's), and it'll take time for us to work these differences out. I understand that I seem unfair to you at times, and that that makes you mad. I'm really glad you tell me how you feel."

        Relatives face the same loyalty conflict about ranking new stepchildren as family "equals." These dilemmas are most often felt at initial holiday or special celebration times, and when co-parents or when  relatives make post-re/marriage wills.

        The "fairness" struggles usually recede as a stepfamily's complex merger slowly progresses (Project 9),  but that isn't certain. Openly acknowledging "inclusion confusion" and honest inequalities with humor and without excessive shame or guilt is healthy and commendable!
 

[ Myths 25 - 26 ] My research since 1979 suggests that after child-related disputes, financial matters are the second most conflictual surface issues for typical stepfamily adults. Typical surface (vs. primary) issues include...

The "fairness," promptness, and reliability of receiving child support, and how the receiving co-parent/s choose to spend such support. Indignant stepparents can urge their mates to use the courts if necessary to raise, lower, get, or stop child support - which inevitably causes resentments in the other bioparent's home, and traps stepkids in powerful loyalty conflicts and relationship triangles.  .

Ambiguity and vagueness in many divorce decrees about which bioparent should pay for what child expense. Absent or "deadbeat" bioparents who avoid or resist paying child support cause everyone heartburn. Even if such issues have been stable for years, a teen's looming college costs or unexpected medical expenses can trigger high conflict in and between stepfamily homes.

Intact biofamilies usually have two parents who blend their individual financial values and priorities to make money decisions. Most stepfamilies have three or more co-parents doing this, so reaching a stable financial consensus is often tougher.

Step and/or bio-relatives can covertly or openly take sides on who's responsible for which child expenses. This creates or amplifies divisive inclusion and loyalty conflicts and relationship triangles.

Major lifestyle differences between co-parents' homes can cause stress. If one divorcing bioparent can only provide a frugal environment for their visiting or resident kids, and their ex and any new mate can spend lavishly, the chance for growing stressful comparisons, guilt, and resentment is high.

      More typical surface stepfamily "money" issues...

Spouse's (or relatives') hurts and resentments over "unfair" divorce settlements can linger well beyond a biofamily's breakup. Active arguments over property settlements can extend far past the re/marriage of one co-parent - e.g. if a house or other valuable joint property sells years later.

Re/married mates' trying to agree on how much a stepparent "should" (want to) contribute to normal and special expenses of each stepchild. If they're supporting kids of their own, the "fairness" of their money allocations can become raging family-wide loyalty conflicts. Spouses who equate their mate's financial contribution as a clear measure of their love and commitment can feel hurt and resentment or gratitude.

Making a new will or estate plan after exchanging commitment vows often brings out unexpectedly intense stepfamily-wide loyalty conflicts and webs of relationship triangles.  The same is true with adjusting life and medical insurance coverages and legal titles to homes, vehicles, and securities.

        Typical wounded, needy courting couples don't discover and negotiate major differences on these complex financial topics before committing and cohabiting. Even if they do, unresolved barriers with other family adults and kids will contribute to major surface conflicts over stepfamily "money issues."

        The primary problems underlying all stepfamily "money problems" are adults' psychological wounds and denials, and their unawareness of (a) stepfamily hazards and (b) realities, and (c) how to problem-solve effectively as mutually-respectful teammates.

        The frequency, complexity, and intensity of typical surface disputes over money are usually significantly greater than in average intact biofamilies. For more perspective, read these Q&A items and articles about resolving such disputes between mates, ex mates, and/or step-relatives.
 

[ Myth 27 ]  Depending on state laws, re/marriage usually doesn't endow stepparents with the legal parental rights or responsibilities of bioparents. For example: unless authorized by a legal document called "In Loco Parentis" signed by both bioparents, typical stepparents can't legally demand to see their stepkids' school or medical records, and don't qualify as a legal guardian in hospitalizing a minor stepchild.

        If the most loving stepparent dies without a will, their assets will usually not go to their stepchildren. Specific rights and laws vary by state, so ask a local family-law professional to tell you what pertains in your county - ideally before exchanging commitment vows!
 

[ Myth 28 ] Studies suggest that in about one of three typical U.S. multi-home stepfamilies, one or more minor kids will move from one bioparent's house to the other at some time. These moves may be well-planned and harmonious, or unexpected and highly disruptive, emotionally, financially, and logistically. Many things may lead a stepchild to move in unexpectedly with their non-custodial parent and stepparent, even years after their parent's re/wedding. For example:

The custodial bioparent "not being able to handle" a teen's "acting out";

The custodial parent re/marrying, and a "war" breaking out between their child and the new stepparent and/or a live-in stepsibling or step-relative;

The death, injury, breakdown, depression, illness, addiction, job loss, bankruptcy, or jailing of the custodial bioparent;

The non-custodial bioparent getting custody because the custodial parent is clearly  neglecting and/or abusing their children;

The custodial co-parent wants to move out of state, and the other bioparent legally petitions for physical custody rights;

A minor child becomes legally old enough to choose their primary home (often by age 14), and demands equal time with their other bioparent; or...

A grown child separates or divorces, and returns to a re/married bioparent's home  - perhaps with young kids - "for awhile."

        Even if well planned, such physical moves and custody changes often send shock waves through the sending and receiving homes' routines, finances, holidays, space allocation, and roles. So: stepfamily co-parents in each home should expect the possibility of kids' changing homes, however initially unlikely. It's prudent to develop at least a rough contingency plan (living space, finances, discipline, etc.) early on.
 

[ Myths 29 & 30 ]  For personal and family health, all stepfamily members need to thoroughly mourn major personal losses (broken bonds) from (a) prior divorce/s or adult death, and (b) stepfamily cohabiting and  merging. Previously-single, childless stepparents usually lose prized quiet, privacy, and home-control by choosing to join an absent-parent family with visiting or resident stepkids and "interfering" ex mates and kin.

       The natural human reflex to mourn broken bonds can be hindered or blocked by low-nurturance family and social environments. If a "loser" (one with losses) was taught as a child to fear, numb, or self-medicate painful emotions, s/he'll have trouble feeling and expressing the shock, confusion, rage, and sadness that major life-losses evoke.

       Also, if a young or grown "loser" lives among people who discourage honest, full expression of these feelings ("You're such a wimp! Put on a happy face right now!"); fully accepting their losses and what they mean can be slowed or prevented.

        Premise: incomplete grief and/or an inability to bond (a) promote addictions, "depressions," chronic "irritability" and anger, psychological and legal divorce, and (b) chronic physical conditions like high blood pressure, some digestive and sleep problems, and obesity.

        Our profit-seeking media emphasizes speed, excitement, sex, and pleasure - which distracts us from the healthy discomfort of grieving because wounded, unaware adults and kids want that. This  increases major personal, family, and societal stress and illness. In this divorce-prevention Web site, family Project 5 focuses on building "pro-grief" families.

        Can you define your family's current "grief policy" now? For more perspective, try this quiz, and mull these questions about losses and healthy 3-level mourning that your family adults should research.
 

[ Myth 31 ]  I have worked with over 1,000 typical Midwestern divorcing-family and stepfamily co-parents since 1981. None of them could pass this quiz about effective communication and problem-solving basics. Part of their crippling unawareness was they didn't know what they needed to know about effective thinking and communicating. Like their ancestors, they were unable to model and teach their descendents these essential life skills - and they didn't know that or what it meant.

        A corollary is that typical family adults can't describe...

  • the difference between "fighting" and win-win problem solving;

  • what values and loyalty conflicts and relationship triangles are, and...

  • how to avoid or resolve each of these relationship stressors effectively.

        Can you describe these? Adult ignorance of them is a major causes of unhappiness in most families (like yours?). The good news is, once adults (a) are guided by their true Selves and (b) learn communication basics and how to spot these problems, they can (c) evolve effective strategies to resolve them and (d) teach their kids how to do the same.

        Family Project 2 provides a framework and many resources to help family adults and supporters learn how to communicate effectively together using seven vital skills. This is essential for resolving common barriers to co-parenting teamwork in divorcing families and stepfamilies. The practical guidebook for Project 2 is Satisfactions (Xlibris Corp., 2002).

        See these vital Q&A items about communicating, and this article about specific ways you can improve your thinking and communicating effectiveness - i.e. get more needs met more often.
 

Myth 32 ] Premise: it's essential for divorcing bioparents to explain to each minor or grown child why their family is dis-integrating, in age-appropriate language. If the kids are to grieve well and have a chance to build healthy relationships with new step-kin, parents' helping them to make clear sense out of the chaos of their biofamily reorganization is vital.

        This doesn't mean each bioparent should blame and smear their former partner or themselves. It does mean each father and mother should work toward...

  • Realistically understanding what caused their divorce, including the possibility one or both mates were significantly needy, wounded, and unaware, and made up to three unwise courtship choices;

  • Forgiving themselves and each other,

  • Sketching the main reasons for their divorce objectively, in age-appropriate terms, to each child, and...

  • Listening to the kids' reactions empathically, without judgment or guilty defensiveness.

       Unless in personal wound-recovery, typical survivors of low-nurturance childhoods (reality 10) often have a hard time doing these divorce-explanation steps. Not doing them risks "endless" bitterness and hostility between ex-mates; bewilderment, confused loyalties, high shame and guilt in their biokids; and growing frustration in new mates.

+ + +

Continue with typical stepfamily realities 33-40 of 60.
 

<<  Previous page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email the address of this article  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  January 04, 2009