Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents

Improve Intimacy With Your Mate
Without Losing Your Boundaries

p. 1 of 2

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW

colorbar.gif (1095 bytes)

  • home >site overview > site map, directory, or search > solutions index, Q&A, or other page > here

The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/08/intimacy.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your brow-ser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.

        This is one of over 150 articles focused on healing psychological wounds,  building high-nurtur-ance family relationships, breaking the [wounds + unawareness] cycle, and preventing divorce. This intro-duction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make. These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help.

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        This article assumes you're familiar with these concepts...

 

         My client was a well dressed, soft spoken man in his late 40's that I’ll call Jerry. He leaned forward anxiously, and said. "My wife complains that she doesn't know who I am. I don't know what to do with that. I am who I am."

I asked "What do you think she wants from you?" He looked away, and then said "Sharon says she never knows what I think or feel."

"I notice that you're here by yourself..." Jerry seemed sad. "She says this is my problem, not hers."

"Mm. So you're here to 'get fixed' to please her?" He avoided the uncomfortable question and my eyes: "Well, I want to get to know myself better."

        Jerry’s surface problem seemed to have two parts: (a) satisfying his wife’s need for emotional intimacy, and (b) increasing his intimacy with himself. My sense was that he - like many men and some women - wasn’t yet aware of the unfilled needs causing each of these quests.

        This article proposes that you mates can intentionally increase your shared intimacy over time by choosing to help each other...

  • identify and reduce any false-self wounds,

  • improve your thinking and communicating skills,

  • intentionally improve your trust and honesty;

  • honor your gender-based priority differences about intimacy, and...

  • balance each other’s needs for intimacy and personal privacy and dignity (boundaries).

The article defines intimacy, explores these four factors, and uses them to offer a dozen specific suggestions for improving your intimacies with yourselves and each other. A companion article extends them to explore options for improving your sexual intimacy.

        Because your marital intimacy is a blend of emotional, spiritual, and physical communion, using intellect and logic to understand and discuss it is challenging. The ideas below aim to stir your awareness about intimacy, not to propose a cookbook solution.

# Status check: start by learning something about yourself. T = True; F = false, and ? = "I'm not sure," or "It depends... (on what?)"

My partner and I each have a clear, compatible  definition of “marital intimacy” now   (T  F ?)

We've had a meaningful discussion on our intimacy needs and satisfactions in the last six months. (T  F ?)

On a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (totally satisfied), I’d say my partner’s recent satisfaction in our shared intimacy is about a ___.

On the same scale, I’d rate my own recent intimacy satisfaction as a ___.

Neither my mate nor I have a significant “intimacy problem" now. (T  F ?)

If we do have a problem, I see it as our problem, not yours or mine. (T  F ?)

My mate and I have compatible definitions of interpersonal vulnerability now. (T  F ?)

My partner and I can talk about our intimacy needs and boundaries comfortably and clearly now. (T  F ?)

There is nothing about myself or our lives that I fear discussing honestly with my mate now. (T  F ?)

I am not repressing or denying anything significant to myself now. (T  F ?)

I believe my partner feels s/he can discuss any personal need, feeling, or other subject with me safely now. (T  F ?)

I feel a mix of calm, centered, energized, light, focused, resilient, up, grounded, relaxed, alert, aware, serene, purposeful, and clear, so my true Self is leading my other subselves (personality) now. (T  F ?) If not, your answers above may be skewed.

        Pause for a moment, and listen in on your self-talk: your emotions, body sensations, and thought streams…

colorbutton.gif What is Intimacy?

        How would you describe intimacy to a high-school senior? Do you need it? How do you know when you have enough of it? What if you don't have enough, like Sharon (above)? Can couples like you intention-ally increase their intimacy satisfactions?

        Average men first consider questions like these in sexual terms. Typical females focus more on feelings, empathy, companionship and closeness. One of marriage's challenges is to meet in the middle of the gender-gap often and well enough for both of you.

        To add to the challenge, individual men and women differ in their (a) intimacy needs, (b) awarenesses of their needs, and (c) abilities to assert their needs effectively. These variables can combine to cause discomfort or satisfaction in any primary relationship - like yours.

        The Latin root intimare meant "to make familiar with." Jerry and Sharon were struggling to fill at least three core needs:

  • to "know" (be familiar with) their mate and...

  • “be known” by them “enough,” while...

  • respecting their respective needs for personal boundaries (privacy).

The degree of intimacy-tension between you mates varies with how intense these three needs are in each of you, and how well your needs mesh. Another variable is how distracted (unfocused, unaware) each of you are most of the time and with each other

        If you're in a stepfamily, you may wonder if stepfamily mates like you have a harder time satisfying intimacy needs than first-marriers. From seven years' remarital experience and 29 years' clinical research. I say “yes,” because you have many more family members, roles, relationships, and adjustment tasks to consider; and related conflicts and confusions to resolve.

        Let's define “marital intimacy” as the dynamic process of each of you mates trusting the safety of honestly disclosing your current feelings, needs, fantasies, dreams, fears, hopes, “failings” and limitations, “general thoughts,” and honest relationship feedback to yourself and your partner.

        From this, vulnerability is willingness to disclose and ask for these personal things despite the risk of painful scorn, rejection, misunderstanding, and/or indifference. The protective reflexes of denial, repression, and harmful compulsions like addiction exist because many of us aren’t willing to risk searing self-scorn (shame), guilts, and anxieties (worries) by being intimate (honest) with ourselves.

        A simpler definition is “marital intimacy is each partner risking honest disclosure of (a) who they really are, (b) who they see their mate to really be, and (c) how satisfied they are now with their relationship.” Perhaps our infantile need for mirroring from our primary caretakers never really fades. Mirroring involves exchanging non-verbal behaviors that say “I see (respond to) you, I see me, and I see us - right now and over time.” Your personal identity is based on your earliest experiences of those signals.

        The degree of intimacy you exchange with your mate is directly proportional to how intimate you each are with yourselves. When Jerry said “I want to get to know myself better,” that may have meant “I want to be more intimate with myself.”

       From this, I propose that your marital intimacy dis/satisfaction hinges on two core factors: (a) whether either of you carries significant psychological wounds from a low-nurturance childhood, and (b) how effectively you think and communicate. Let's explore each of these...

colorbutton.gif Intimacy and Psychological Wounds

true Self, or less-well guided by several other well-meaning subselves - a "false self." If you're curious or skepti-cal about these ideas, read this letter to you, try this safe, interesting exercise, and scan this comparison. Then return here.

        People often governed by a false self can be unaware of it and up to five related psychological wounds - excessive shame, guilts, and fears; and trust and reality distortions. For some, these combine to cause difficulty bonding with (emotionally attaching to, or caring about) some or all living things. If such Grown Wounded Children  (GWCs) "hit true (vs. pseudo) bottom," they can choose to reduce their wounds over time with qualified help. See Project 1 in this site for more.

        The more of these wounds you and/or your mate have now, the harder it will be to achieve anxiety-free self intimacy. The lower your self-intimacies, the lower your mutual intimacy. To raise their intimacy satisfactions, Jerry and Sharon needed to want to assess  for psychological wounds as teammates, and help each other proactively reduce any they find. Paradoxically, unawareness and their wounds will inhibit their doing this together without one or both o them hitting true bottom and seeking knowledgeable help.

        For Jerry (and you?), “get to know myself better,” begins with awareness of factors like these:

What am I thinking, feeling, needing, and doing right now, and over time?

What is my body saying to me now?

How serene is my spirit or soul?

What are my preferences, key beliefs, attitudes, and priorities?

How high is my self-respect as a person, wo/man, spouse, parent, friend, and citizen?

What stresses me, and why?

What do these mean to me, individually and together?

What am I on Earth to do – what’s my life purpose?”

        Can you identify other topics that would add to your self-intimacy? Do you know anyone who is learning to be aware of such personal things without guilts, shame, and/or fears? Some people choose - often in mid-life - to journal, meditate, and/or join self-awareness groups to progress at this self-knowing.

        Significant false-self wounds block self and mutual intimacies in several concurrent ways:

        Excessive shame, guilts, and fears promote emotional numbness, repression, and denials of the factors above, including protective denial of these. The Shamed Child  is certain “If I allow honest dis-closure, I’ll have to face how disgusting, worthless, and unlovable I am.” The Scared Child's (and other subselves’) fear of emotional overwhelm (“losing control of myself or my center”) translates to fear or terror of experiencing intense emotions and some physical sensations.

        False-self dominance promotes fuzzy thinking, distraction via “mind-racing,” and inner and outer reality distortions, specially in high-emotion situations. These inhibit awareness and clarity, which are essential for self and mutual intimacy.

        Excessive distrusts cast doubts on (a) personal perceptions and judgments ("self doubt"), and (b) the safety of honest disclosure of intimacy factors to _ myself, _ you, and _ my Higher Power. Subselves’ distrust that your true Self can prevent inner-family chaos when emotions and physical sensations are intense causes a low tolerance for emotional and physical (sexual) intimacy.

        Difficulty bonding promotes pseudo (pretended), approach-avoid, and independent (low-need, low nurturance) relationships. Any of these can result from a low or frozen ability to need or tolerate intimacy.

        If you haven’t experienced and accepted the reality of your inner family of subselves yet, this will have little meaning for you. If you have validated your busy subselves, does the above make sense to you? For perspective, recall my premise from 27 years’ clinical experience with troubled couples: significantly-wounded people tend to pick each other repeatedly, until starting true (vs. pseudo) wound-recovery.

        That means that if you or your mate had a low-nurturance childhood, you both are probably significantly wounded. That means you probably have trouble with self and mutual intimacy (vs. sex) and other relationship stressors, unless you're effectively reducing your wounds and empowering your true Self.

        Even if you partners are not majorly wounded, another intimacy-inhibitor may need attention:

colorbutton.gif Intimacy and Effective Communication

        Can you define effective communication? I propose that it occurs when (a) both people feel their current primary needs are satisfied enough, (b) in a way that both feel good enough about. This is most apt to happen when each person is steadily led by their true Self, and  both are fluent in the seven Project-2 communication skills.

        Your inner and mutual intimacy discomforts are far more likely to stay resolved if you know how to...

  • identify and assert your primary (vs. surface) needs clearly,

  • listen empathically, metatalk, and...

  • problem-solve - as mutually-respectful teammates vs. antagonists.

Jerry and Sharon couldn’t do this with their intimacy-related conflicts. They were each very wounded, and didn’t (want to) know or acknowledge that. In early middle age, neither had hit true bottom yet.

        Can you mates name the seven skills, and how to “do” each of them now? You two can learn these together at any time. From consulting with well over 600 typical (Midwestern US) couples since 1981, my experience is that less than 5% of typical divorced and/or re/married co-parents use these powerful skills.

        This is partly because U.S. caregivers and schools don't teach the seven skills and their many benefits. Also, in my professional experience, few human-service professionals are trained and motivated to encourage clients to learn and use the seven skills. If you work with a clinical helper, can s/he name the skills?

        You may also be hindered from improving your thinking and communicating skills by your (false selves’) normal reluctance to change (risk new things). Do you and/or your partner prefer familiar discom-fort over the risks of new beliefs, experiences, and behaviors? A common false-self wound is excessive fear of the unknown, which is a symptom of distrust in your Self, other people, and your Higher Power.

Examples...

        Here are some of the ways these communication skills can raise your intimacy satisfactions, once your Selves are guiding your inner teams:

  • Awareness reveals what you each think, feel, need (superficially), and do, including (a) how you try to get your needs met, and (b) how well your strategy works;

  • Clear thinking (vs. logic) refines your awarenesses, and helps you stay focused on identifying and filling your and your partner's needs for intimacy and other things;

  • Digging down helps you discern the (a) primary needs underlying your surface (intimacy) needs and (b) who’s responsible for filling them;

  • Empathic listening and respectful "hearing checks" empower you to hear each other clearly with your hearts;

  • Assertion (vs. submission or aggression) empowers you each to describe your intimacy needs to each other in a way the other can really hear;

  • Metatalk allows you to discuss and improve your (a) internal and (b) mutual communication processes (thinking and discussing); and…

  • Problem-solving combines all six skills and a mutual-respect attitude to cooperatively brainstorm (a) filling your respective primary needs (b) in ways that feel good enough to you each.

        Learning to communicate more effectively involves replacing some cherished old values, assump-tions, beliefs, and habits with new ones. A key example: wounded co-parents’ false selves often believe "My current needs are less (or more) important than yours." To harvest the major benefits of the seven skills, you partners need to shift that to Your and my rights, needs, and integrities are usually of equal importance to me.

        Another toxic belief is "Conflict is scary, unsafe, and bad." No, it's natural, inevitable, and –