Project 11 of 12 - help each other evolve and use a support network

Tips On Support-group
Process Management, and Effective Group Leadership

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW

colorbar.gif (1095 bytes)

  • home > site overview > site map or directory > Q&A, Project 11 links, Solutions article,  or other page > here

The Web address of this three-page article is http://sfhelp.org/11/sg-thriv1.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.

        This is one of over 150 articles focused on building high-nurturance family relationships and preventing divorce. This introduction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make.

        These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help. The "/" in re/marriage and re/divorce notes that it may be a stepparent's first union. "Co-parents" means both bioparents, or any of the three or more related stepparents and bioparents co-managing a multi-home nuclear stepfamily. 

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        This is the seventh in a series of Project-11 Web pages focusing on building an effective support group for stepfamily co-parents. Option: download a free booklet (#15) containing all these pages.


      
    Organization Topics (continued)


question mark  What group-process guidelines will help us meet our goals?

       There are key factors that greatly shape a co-parent support group's effectiveness. I suggest you evolve early - and enforce respectfully - clear group policies on these points...

            Here's a brief look at each of these.

Punctuality: Most members will feel better about the group if they can count on knowing when each meeting will start and end. People arriving after the meeting has started - or leaving before the end - disrupts focus, mood, and momentum.

        That takes everyone’s time to rebuild. If meetings consistently run longer than advertised or agreed, members (specially those with baby sitters) can feel stressed and resentful, and lean toward dropping out. You may find it useful to ask that if people are unavoidably detained, they be responsible for calling and letting the host/leader know that.

        Every group has a unique blend of members’ needs about timeliness. If in doubt what your group’s blend is - ask everyone what they need!

Smoking and other drug usage: An increasing number of people feel second-hand tobacco smoke is both unpleasant and unhealthy. And - even one person who attends a support group meeting "under the influence" will probably be a major distraction to most others - and a turn-off for new people. 

        If your group tolerates members being high or drunk, you are enabling them (promoting an unhealthy habit). That’s opposite to your (presumed) shared goal of fostering personal, stepfamily, and group health.

       At the very least, poll all members on this point when you organize, and agree on (and enforce) a clear policy on chemical usage. Note that if your policy says "We ask that people who have just used mind- altering drugs not attend", that implies if someone comes in high, your host/leader will have to assertively ask them to leave. To say the obvious, unenforced policies are worthless.

Confidentiality: Effective support groups feel consistently safe - allowing members to reveal personal or intimate details of their lives without fear of ridicule or reporting sensitive things to the outside world. It helps to build group trust and intimacy if you remind everyone at the start of each meeting "What’s said here stays here," or some such theme. 

        An ongoing option is for people who share sensitive information to ask everyone to keep it within the group. If someone discloses probable criminal behavior, or child abuse or neglect, you have a moral and legal obligation to report those immediately to the appropriate authorities.

"Air time" and interruptions: A standard group task each meeting is to balance the time available with members’ needs to vent, discuss, problem-solve, and get feedback. One way of doing that is for the leader to ask people to say during their initial check-in if they want group air time.

        Then try to manage the group process so that those who need time get enough. A structured way of doing this is to divide the "business" time available by the number of people who want time, and allocate the resulting number of minutes to each person. Have the group stay alert to how interruptions feel to them, as they speak and listen. 

        Some interruptions can feel very supportive. Others can distract from where the speaker is "going" - or derail them completely. Talk together about how you all want to handle the latter. One option is to give responsibility to each speaker about their own tolerance for interruptions, and invite respectful assertions.

Confrontation: A challenging aspect to any support group is how to handle members’ inevitable disagreements on stepfamily decisions. People’s values on co-parenting, marriage, finances, and "family health" vary widely. Your group will evolve a policy - spoken or unspoken - on what you all do when one member describes something that one or several others strongly disagree with.

        Average stepfamilies are riddled with emotional, controversial topics: child discipline, visitation, and custody; money management; relations with ex mates; grieving; stepparent rejection; adoption, privacy; etc. I suggest that when values disagreements occur in your group (and they will!), the disagreer/s give their reaction in the form of a respectful "I message," rather than a blaming or accusatory statement.

        I-messages avoid name-calling, or using adjectives like stupid, childish, idiotic, and ridiculous. "I messages" sound like: "Jack, when you describe using a belt to reprimand your stepson, I get really uncomfortable. I’m afraid that kind of action will generate fear, resentment and shame in Georgie. Are you open to feedback on other ways to enforce your discipline?

        The focus here is on the disagreer’s reaction, rather than blaming or accusing the original speaker. The group-divisive alternative is to come out with something like "Jack, that’s outright child abuse. How can you do that? Millie, how can you let him do that to your son - are you crazy?"

        Also - build a professional referral list that you can use for people to take positive action, when conflicted. Stay focused that you are a support group, not the Grand Inquisition. If someone is doing some co-parenting (or re/marital) thing that seems harmful, then respectful, constructive confrontation is a gift.

       Not confronting is enabling, which is potentially hurtful, and erodes Self respect. Stay aware also that you’re not there to win the co-parenting Olympics. Hopefully, members come to encourage and learn, not compete with others.

Griping and group conflict vs. problem-solving. Probably the biggest support-group killer is that group meetings turn into predictable "bitch sessions." People can leave such meetings feeling like stepfamily life is gloomy, awful, and chaotic - and that there’s no way out, or reason to hope. 

        A basic decision that all founding members need to make is whether they’re meeting to find effective solutions to their confusing stepfamily dilemmas or not. It’s easy to complain, whine, and play "Ain’t it awful." It’s harder - and far more rewarding - to use the group’s empathy, wisdom and creativity to seek clear, effective new attitudes and behaviors.

       The next step here is for the leader or another member to confront the griper/s. Say something like "Sandra, I feel we’re over-focusing on your problem. Are you ready to shift now to decide what changes you want, and options for getting that?" Another way of confronting respectfully is for any member to ask the speaker "What do you want (or need) from us right now?"


Couples Arguing. A normal group-process issue is learning how to handle co-parenting partners’ arguing or fighting excessively in the group. Suggestions:

Hear and validate them: "you two are really having trouble finding a win-win compromise here. You’re in a standard loyalty (or values) conflict, and your high frustration and anger seem to be blocking you each from hearing each other."

Re/focus them: "Are you willing to have us help you problem-solve now?" What if they say "No!"?

Limit them: Major re/marital and co-parenting firefights in one couple can use up a whole meeting. Honor them and other members by calling time on a warring couple, after hearing them, and asking what they need. That will be easier if everyone has a clear idea on what the group’s consensual "air time" policy is.

Refer them: unless you have a trained clinician present and are a therapy group vs. a support group, assertively suggest to a couple having the same problem/s meeting after meeting that they seek professional counsel. Ideally, your group will evolve a list of stepfamily-aware local professionals to refer to. Lastly ...

Learn from them: Conflicted couples are a key reason co-parent support groups exist. If a couple is at an impasse in your group, observe them empathically and try to understand why they get stuck. It’s often far easier to see the causes in another couple than in your own primary relationship!

        Another important group-policy item is on ...


Giving feedback. Communication occurs to fill people’s current needs. Six universal needs are to...

    1)  Feel respected by your Self and your current partner/s (always present),

    2)  Cause impact or action, including regulating the emotional distance between the speaker and listener/s, 

    3)  Vent - i.e. to feel empathically understood and non-judgmentally accepted,

    4)  Get or give new ideas or information,

    5)  Feel intellectual and emotional stimulation, vs. boredom; and/or to...

    6)  Avoid something uncomfortable.

        Unless members specifically ask for help or suggestions ("new information") on a situation, assume their need is to vent, and avoid a barrage of advice-giving. It can feel like a shaming discount if a group member says "Well, obviously, what you should do is...". This implies that the "fixer" is wiser and "1-up", and knows how the listener should live "right" (though maybe they do!). Two helpful alternatives to "fixing" (advising) are ...

  • focus constructively (vs. critically) on how the person or couple is trying to solve their problem - i.e. focus on their process. Typically couples (or co-parents and kids) fight and argue, rather than co-operatively problem-solve. Often, that’s the real problem; and ...

  • Join with the speaker/s (when they’re ready) and co-operatively brainstorm alternatives they can pick from.

       See the pages on effective communication and seven skills, including on win-win problem-solving.

question mark  What is "effective group leadership?"

        This factor alone can make or break the eventual success of your support group. Like high-nurturance families, I’ve never seen a well-functioning support group without one or two consistently- motivated, wholistically healthy leaders. A key reason most groups end (or never get going) is because the leaders are burned out, ambivalent, or ineffective - i.e. inexperienced and/or unaware. 

        What does this key role entail? Some typical leadership responsibilities:

  • Provide the initial support group vision, spirit, and dedication;

  • Organize and conduct the initial meetings;

  • Hold planning meetings to determine the support group’s aims, policies, and logistics;

  • Arrange for volunteers to share the group’s administrative tasks. Delegate to and co- ordinate them, resolve conflicts in and among them, and recognize and appreciate them regularly for their efforts;

  • Conduct each support meeting effectively, or delegate that to another effective co-leader. Set each meeting’s tone (e.g. optimism vs. gloom) and agenda, and follow it - unless unexpected crises arise.

  • Balance meetings’ content dynamically between stepfamily business, and group administration tasks. Effective, here, means that most of those attending get their major needs met in a way every-one feels good enough about.

  • Act as community spokesperson for the group, or delegate that job and monitor it.

  • Stay aware of general and special group needs, and co-ordinate the talents and resources of group members and the community to meet them.

  • Balance personal stepfamily needs with all group members’ needs. Avoid overusing the group as a personal resource.

  • Make clear, timely administrative decisions about group process. Confront problems promptly and assertively. Facilitate group problem-solving supportively, when members conflict.

  • Negotiate with any guest speakers, and co-ordinate their time, focus, and participation.

  • Monitor what group members come for, and whether they’re getting enough of their needs met. If not, take responsibility for problem-solving that.

  • Take (or delegate) overall responsibility for recruiting appropriate new members, and do so.

  • Ask for help with these responsibilities, and delegate, when they feel too much.

  • Groom another effective leader, and hand the baton to them when feeling burned out, or personally "done". Then let go; and …

  • Enjoy doing all this, (usually), over time!

       Because this is asking a lot of one person, having co-leaders can guard against overload, burn-out, illness, and responsibilities "falling through the cracks."

+ + +

    Continue this Project-11 support-group series with ideas on support-group goals, member screening, and meeting topic options.
     

<<  Previous page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email the Web address of this series  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  October 01, 2008