Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents

Identify and Own Your Attitudes

They Shape Your Co-parenting Relationships - p. 2 of 2

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW
 

colorbar.gif (1095 bytes)

The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/Rx/ex/attitudes.htm

        This page concludes examining the effects of 10 key co-parent attitudes on family relationships and health. A key attitude to consider:

6) Is Conflict Bad?

        "Conflict" occurs when two or more people (or subselves) have different perceptions, beliefs, values, and/or needs. Would you agree that all conflicts cause some degree of psychological discomfort (confu-sion + guilts + hurt + anger + frustration + anxiety) in each person involved? Normal humans and other animals are programmed to avoid or reduce discomfort.

        What are your co-parents’ attitudes about fighting, arguing, and conflict - in general, and in your homes and family? Did your parents and grandparents consistently value conflict? Do you know anyone who sees conflict as a (potentially) good thing?

        I've heard scores of courting co-parents say proudly “We never fight!” That suggests the speaker/s...

  • believed that conflict is bad or wrong,

  • weren’t confident about using disagreements to build their relationship,

  • hadn't graduated from blissful courtship idealism to relationship reality yet, and...

  • weren't aware of the vital difference between lose-lose fighting or arguing and win-win problem-solving.

        Divorce and later legal battles imply that the former mates weren’t able to problem-solve effectively. In typical divorcing families and stepfamilies, disagreements inside  people (among their subselves) and between members and homes are common and inevitable, not bad! If you co-parents have usually exper-ienced fights as stressful and unfulfilling in childhood and married life, you’re apt to unconsciously expect them to be the same after divorce.

        You’ll probably (a) avoid them, or (b) automatically react to family conflict with a combative win-lose  (adversarial) mindset. If a false self  rules any of your co-parents, their subselves may enjoy fighting and uproar, and/or seek to punish someone for hurting them. True Selves don’t value those.

        Your terminology counts, here: fighting and arguing are associated with antagonism, aggression, disrespect, power, combat, winning, and losing. Problem-solving and conflict resolution are associated with cooperation, mediation, willing compromise, and mutual respect. Note the powerful difference between aggression (“I want _____, and I don’t care what you feel or want”) and respectful assertion:  (“I need _____ now. What do you need?”)

        Forming an effective co-parenting team over time will cause your adults and kids many major conflicts over childcare goals, values, styles, discipline, visitation, financial support, custody, celebrations, and other things. Is anything blocking you from imagining that these disputes can often have win-win-win outcomes?

        If your co-parents...

  • are guided by their true Self (capital "S"); and choose to…

  • see each other as equals in dignity and worth, despite disagreements; and…

  • are clearly aware of what they and their family members really need; and …

  • are becoming fluent in the seven Project-2 skills; then...

...they can view inevitable family conflicts as useful opportunities to build teamwork and bonding together, not something to be avoided, denied, or criticized. Your kids and their descendents depend on you co-parents to want to do hold this attitude, and demonstrate it consistently.

Status check: our family adults' attitudes about internal and interpersonal conflict consistently strengthen our stepfamily now. (True  False  ?)

        This is pretty dry (and important) stuff. Breathe, stretch, and see if you need a mind/body break… When you’re ready, recheck: is your Self still leading your inner family? Let’s continue strengthening your co-parent-teambuilding base by exploring your adults' attitudes about…


7) Is Change Scary (Bad), or Comfortable and Productive?

        Would you agree that our need to expect and adapt to personal, social, and environmental change never changes? Would you also agree that divorce, re/marriage, and cohabiting cause desired and unpleasant changes in all these things? Your co-parents’ attitudes about change will greatly affect how well you all...

  • recover from false-self wounds,

  • grieve your many losses,

  • resolve your many internal and interpersonal conflicts,

  • form new (step)family bonds, and...

  • adjust to new family roles, rules, rituals, and living conditions.

Do you agree?

        Do you welcome change, and feel confident about your ability to adapt to it? Does each of your co-parents feel this way? Do your kids? Did your parents? Some of your personality   subselveswelcome change, others fear and oppose it, and still others may not care. In other words, you may have conflicting attitudes about change within you. A common manifestation of this is what Dr. Paul Watzlawick and colleagues have called "first-order (changeless) changes" - like diets that don't work permanently,

        New Years' resolutions that fade, and addiction-recoveries that relapse. Behaviors change for a while, but the core attitudes beneath them don't. When true Selves are solidly in charge of their personalities, people (like you) are much more likely to achieve lasting second-order (core attitude) changes.

        Reality: you can’t force insecure subselves to trust that environmental change will be comfortable and safe enough. Your true Self can learn to demonstrate to your other subselves that change is safe enough if they trust your Self to lead them in adapting to planned and unexpected changes.

        Healthy grief is the psychological- spiritual-mental process that leads to genuine acceptance of change (loss). My experience is that blocked grief is one of five major stressors in troubled and divorcing families. You can grow pro-grief homes together (Project 5) if your co-parents...

  • are aware of personal and environmental changes, and accept them as inevitable;

  • see these changes as “usually safe enough;” and...

  •  view change as “usually beneficial, long-term.”

Does this describe each of your co-parents, so far? What attitudes about change are you grownups teaching your kids by your behaviors (vs. your words)?

Status check: Our family adults' individual and collective attitudes about change clearly strengthen our family relationships and welfare now. (T  F  ?)  Option: reflect on what your subselves and your body are saying now…

        We’re almost done. Next, consider your co-parents' attitudes about…


8)  Parenting: a Satisfying Challenge or a Stressor?

        Do you know adults who generally welcome the anxieties, doubts, and heartaches of childrearing? People who see parenting as an exciting, rewarding long-term opportunity to co-create something (someone) of rare value? Did each of your parents and grandparents feel something like that? Do you? Do you know any foster, adoptive, or stepparents who feel some version of that about nurturing someone else’s child/ren?

        Check to see if your Self is leading your other subselves now. Then try saying this out loud, and notice what you feel and think:

“I often genuinely enjoy co-parenting, and I want the responsibility and rewards of nurturing the young people in my life.”

       Does that feel true, or do you feel ambivalence? Do any inner voices (subselves) say “Yes, but…”, or “…except for…” Imagine each of your other co-parents saying that sentence out loud - or ask them to do so. What reactions do you expect?

        Co-parents who…

were unwanted conceptions themselves;
are too wounded;  
have unplanned babies; and/or...
had wounded, unavailable, overwhelmed parents;
have idealized visions of parenting and child development;
frequently feel overwhelmed, and/or…
mistakenly expect that having kids will bring social acceptance and/or fill the emptiness within them;...

…often feel ambivalent, dutiful, guilty, or resentful about filling kids’ needs. This is specially likely if they have too little (a) healthy child-raising knowledge, (b) confidence in their and their mate’s capabilities, and (c) social and spiritual supports.

        Divorce and mate death each bring up special needs in kids and adults. So does parental dating, re/wedding, and cohabiting. Adequate bioparenting knowledge, confidence, satisfactions, and goals may be overwhelmed by these concurrent, interactive new needs and environmental changes.

        Childless new stepparents are often stunned by the complexity, conflict, and challenge of sharing responsibility for nurturing their mate’s child/ren. After courtship idealism and optimism fade, stepdads and moms can feel their nurturing role yields more stress than satisfaction and joy – specially if they’re ruled by a false self, and/or their marriage is significantly troubled.

        Premise: your co-parents’ combined attitudes about their childcare responsibilities will help or hinder your forming an effective nurturing team. Do you adults each know what your true attitude about co-paren-ting is? Do you and/or your kids need any adult to change their attitude?

        What's needed for that to hap-pen? Start by evaluating whether an adult is wounded (ruled by a false self). Then assess whether s/he has clear, realistic long-range images of how s/he wants your dependent kids to turn out, or if s/he's mainly focused on resolving current conflicts ("The future will take care of itself.").

Status check: Our co-parents' attitudes about their responsibility to nurture dependent children generally strengthens our family relationships and helps us resolve major conflicts.  (T  F  ?)

        How do you feel about...


9) Losses and Grieving: Good or Bad?

        Can you describe your personal and your family’s "policies" on grieving? Our unaware, wounded society seems to devalue healthy personal and family mourning. We accept this despite a series of inevitable broken bonds which make healthy grief  essential to each of us.

        A loss is a broken psycho-spiritual attachment (bond) to something or someone. Life forces losses on all us adults and kids (like aging), and we choose to break other bonds to get some benefit. How well we (our subselves) grieve affects our wholistic health, our relationship harmonies, and our ability to form new bonds. All people who are able to bond experience minor to devastating losses throughout their lives. Some majorly-wounded kids and adults can't bond. They must fake mourning and intimacy, or be viewed as cold or uncaring (i.e. bad).

        Do you honestly feel that losses are good, bad, or neither? Do you see mourning in _ yourself and _ your family members as useful, normal, and healthy (good), or something to fear and be repressed, avoided, and “gotten over fast”? Do you feel grieving adds to the richness of family relationships and life, or reduces it? Note that “I don’t (want to) know” and “I don’t care” are attitudes.

        What you saw your caregivers and hero/ines do with their losses, and how they reacted to yours have shaped your subselves' attitudes about the value of "good grief." It’s likely that your subselves’ disagree on this, so your dominant subselves will determine "your" attitudes.

        See how you feel about each of these key ideas:

Losses are painful, always follow attachments, and are normal, not good or bad.

Healthy 3-level grief is good, because it promotes psychological balance + wholistic health + long life + eventually forming new bonds.

Blocked grief is bad (harmful), because it will (a) promote (secondary) health problems, (b) hinder your ex mates’ healing and childcare teamwork,  and (c) promote misinforming and significantly wounding your kids.

        Understanding and admitting losses, and valuing healthy three-level mourning, can help your co-parents form an effective nurturing team for your kids. Helping your youngsters learn to grieve well becomes one of your shared co-parenting objectives, over time.

        Pause and reflect: what do you believe each of your co-parents’ good-bad attitudes are about (a) losses (broken bonds) and (b) grieving? Is there any chance you and/or they are blocked in mourning key losses? See Project 5.

Status Check: Each of our co-parents and key relatives' true attitudes about losses and grieving clearly strengthens our family relationships and nurturance level now.  (T  F  ?)

        A final overarching attitude that will affect the relationships between your kids' bioparents and stepparent/s:


10) Is Your Glass Half Full or Half Empty?

        How would you describe the key difference between...

  • a pessimist or cynic;

  • an optimist,

  • an idealist, and

  • a realist?

Which of these best describes you _ in general, and _ relative to your current family’s status and future? Do you think these primal attitudes can significantly help or hinder your building an effective co-parenting team over time? If so, do you think your co-parents can intentionally shift from one of these attitudes to another?

        A pessimist would assumedivorcing family and stepfamily relationships can never be as fulfilling as intact biofamily relationships. Working to build an effective co-parenting team will never work, and wastes time and energy.

        A realistic optimist would assumeIf co-parents are self responsible, patient, and resourceful, divorced-family and re/married-family relationships can be just as satisfying and fulfilling as intact-biofamily counterparts.” They agree with the Chinese, who's written symbol for "crisis" is combines the symbols for danger and opportunity.

        An idealist or optimist would assumeLove, faith, and God will heal all wounds and conquer all obstacles. Families are stronger than any trauma or obstacle, if the adults try and others don’t interfere. Divorce or death will never overcome or block parents' and kids' love for each other. We co-parents don’t really need to be aware of our attitudes, or worry about building a co-parenting team. Stepfamilies are really not significantly different than biofamilies, no matter what so-called ‘experts’ say."

        My experience is that the type of “glass” (life attitude) you have demonstrates who's leading your personality subselves. Generally, survivors of low-nurturance childhoods are often led by critical, perfectionist, idealistic, scared, skeptical, shamed, angry, or hopeless subselves much of the time. Those usually result in glass half-empty or unrealistically cheery, idealistic attitudes – in general or in times of conflict and change.

        People who often are led by their true Selves  and Higher Power tend to be flexible, resilient, open “optimistic realists.” Their glass is often half-full - spontaneously, not from duty, dogma, or fear of scorn or rejection.

        This view implies that if you, and any ex mates, stepparents, or key relatives, are “half-empty” people, a false self often rules that person. Where so, s/he can shift toward genuinely half-full if s/he patently works toward freeing her or his Self to lead (i.e. freely commit to some version of Project 1).

        It also implies that without attention, your co-parents’ (subselves’) expectations about most aspects of your family relationships will focus on reasons why you "can’t succeed,” or why informed, well-discussed changes won’t work. Half-empty people really distrust...

  • the competence of ruling subselves and key others,

  • a dependable, caring Supreme Being, and...

  • “the universe” to be reliably safe enough, long term.

        Part of permanently shifting to a half-full attitude is freeing any anxious, rigid subselves from old fears, guilts, or compulsions about having different values than your childhood caregivers. Did you grow up with genuinely “half-full” people and hero/ines? Who would object or censure you if you shifted toward “realistic optimism”?

        A key implication is that if any of your co-parents is notably “half-empty” (ruled by a fearful and/or cynical false self), you probably can’t convert them by threat, scorn, or “logic” - but you do have impactful options.

Status check: each of our co-parents is clearly a "realistic optimist," which strengthens our family's evolving nurturance level.  (T  F  ?) 

Recap

        Premise: the co-parents in your multi-home family can choose nurturing or toxic attitudes about each other and key aspects of their lives. If each co-parent wants to take responsibility for growing nourishing attitudes like those above, then building an effective co-parent team and a high-nurturance environment for your kids and adults is much more likely. Your attitudes have as much impact on resolving any team-building barriers as your inner-family harmony, your knowledge,  and your communication effectiveness.

        Your co-parents' attitudes are clear signs of which subselves usually dominate their respective personalities. A first step in choosing nurturing attitudes is to become aware of (a) what your ruling subselves currently believe, (b) who governs your personalities, and (c) how their beliefs affect your filling your primary needs.

        Once your co-parents' attitudes are clear, stable, and compatible, you can help each other reduce specific teambuilding barriers if you all also work together to heal significant false-self wounds (Project 1), and improve your communication skills (Project 2).

        Resources: see...

  • these basic premises about your relationships

  • the articles and worksheets in Project 10 for more on building an effective co-parenting team after divorce or co-parent re/marriage

  • this attitude-inventory worksheet to promote awareness and discussion among you all

  • the guidebook Build a Co-parenting Team, which integrates key Solutions articles here on re/building caregiving cooperation among divorced parents and stepparents.

+ + +

        Pause, breathe well, and reflect: why did you begin reading this article? What have you learned from it? If you need to do anything as a result, what - and why?

This article was very helpful  somewhat helpful  not helpful   

<< Prior page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  August 29, 2008