Project 10 of 12  - evolve a high-nurturance co-parenting team

Resolve Child-visitation Conflicts - p. 1 of 2

Help Each Other Fill Your Primary Needs

by Peter K. Gerlach, MSW

colorbar.gif (1095 bytes)

  • home > overview > directory or site map > Q&A, Project-9 links, Solutions article, or other page > here

The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/Rx/spl/visit.htm

        This is one of a series of articles suggesting solutions for common divorced-family and stepfamily relationship problems. The introduction gives perspective on this Break the Cycle! Web site and the author. Use these ideas to augment, not replace, other informed professional counsel.

        Roughly 70% of the millions of Americans who divorce have one or more living children. Most people agree that minor kids and each of their bioparents need to spend "enough" time together. That motivates most divorced people to evolve regular and special child visitations between custodial and non-custodial homes. Where co-parents disagree too much, a family-law judge orders visitation details on behalf of the child/ren. 

        Because of (a) the primal bonds between most parents and kids, and (b) the welter of intense feelings and needs that biofamily separation and divorce cause, conflicts about child visitations (and related topics) can be complex and bitter. Relatives and stepparents can add their own visitation opinions and needs, increasing conflict complexity. Kids - with their own needs and feelings - have little power, and are caught in the middle.

        This article for co-parents explores what each person really needs in typical child-visitation dis-putes, and suggests how to fill those needs effectively. The ideas below will make more sense if you first read...
  • The general factors promoting a high-nurturance family and a healthy relationship;  and...

  • This overview of stepfamily basics, and what being in a stepfamily usually means; and...

  • Overviews of five reasons most stepfamily re/marriages fail or endure in misery, and 12 Projects co-parents can commit to avoid them; and...

  • the common causes of most stepfamily "problems;" and...

  • How to spot and resolve values and loyalty conflicts and associated relationship triangles, and...

  • An overview of up to 60 concurrent developmental and family-adjustment needs that typical stepkids need informed help to fill to become independent young adults.

        If this seems like a lot of work - it is! The implacable TANSTAFL rule applies here (There ain't no such thing as free lunch!) If you want long range personal, re/marital, and co-parental harmony, and the best for your minor kids, you'll have to invest major time and effort to achieve them! The eventual rewards are beyond price and description.

The Child-visitation Cycle

        Premise: minor kids of parental divorce need "enough quality time" with each of their biological parents for mutual psychological health and growth. Each child and parent have a unique definition of enough. Each is ultimately the only person in the universe qualified to judge. Though "enough" changes with age and circumstance, "quality time" does not. More on that in a moment.

        Let's define "regular visitation" as (a) a period of time and (b) a complex sequence of internal and interpersonal events that include...

1) the current primary pre-visitation needs in each person involved, and how the people's needs are ranked by the family decision-makers;  plus...

2) the values and skills (e.g. asserting, listening, and problem-solving)  that each involved person has which shape the overall visitation experience, plus...

3) the non-visitation responsibilities, schedules, and obligations of each child and adult in both homes; plus...

4) the internal and interpersonal planning and problem-solving discussions that occur among all involved about "the coming visit," plus...

5) the verbal or written plans or agreements and expectations that result, and the communication process required to inform everyone of them; plus...

6) the roles of each adult and child (who's responsible for what), and the related sets of household rules (shoulds, oughts, musts, and have to's) that shape how each role is acted out ("You have to see that Jackie wears her dental retainer every night"), plus...

7) the visit preparation process (e.g. packing, cleaning, food buying) in each home, plus...

8)  the "goodbye" process at the child's first home, plus...

9)  transporting the child to the receiving home, plus...

10)  the "welcoming" ritual at that home, plus...

11)  the stabilizing process in both homes, which includes grieving local losses; plus...

12)  the planned and spontaneous activities that occur between the "hellos" and preparing to leave, including conflicts and any inter-home communications; plus...

13)  the preparations in both homes for the child to leave and arrive; plus...

14)  the "goodbye" process at the visited home, plus...

15)  traveling back to the original home, plus...

16)  the "hello" process upon arrival, including "debriefing" ("How was it? How are you?"); plus...

17)  the re-stabilizing of both homes, including everyone grieving new local losses, and the co-parents' and kids evaluating privately and together whether it was "a good visitation" or not; and finally...

18)  any inter-home and other communication needed to "finish" the visitation ("Jack, Marcy left her tennis shoes and wallet at your house. Can you..."). This can also include a web of conversations and reactions with peers and relatives about visitation events and reactions.

        Have you ever seen a "child visitation" cycle broken into all it's parts like this? Would you change this outline in some way? If you're not involved in such a post-divorce ritual yourself, can you empathize with the kids and adults that go a version of through this once or twice a week, or every other week, for years? How do you think it feels to people in both homes? To concerned relatives? 

        This is a generic visitation cycle. Newly-separated families have to invent and stabilize their version of this whole sequence over many months, amidst many other personal and family dynamics. Their cycle must shift and restabilize each time (a) someone moves in or out of each house, and (b) any member of either house has a "significant" life-style change (like starting or graduating from school, re/marriage, cohabiting, custody change, illness or disability, childbirth, job loss,...)

        Even if all concerned achieve "OK stability" in both homes, their basic visitation cycle can have special variations - like "six-week summer vacation," and "year-end school-break visitations." Thus regular visitations may be "OK," but special visitations aren't, or vice versa, according to someone. Cycles involving family birthdays, anniversaries, and other special events usually generate unique primary needs in members of both homes.

        Recap: "child visitation" is (a) a period of time, and (b) a multi-phase process - an  implicit sequence of events that change the structure and dynamics of both homes. Now let's use that to explore...

  What's an Effective Child Visitation?

        Do you know a separated biofamily or a stepfamily in which child visitations are deemed "good enough" by all involved people? Do you know another family where someone feels visitations are stressful, troublesome, conflictual, or unhappy? What makes the difference? I propose that an effective child visitation is one which...

  • all involved kids and adults...

  • thoughtfully agree afterward...

  • that everyone's major primary (vs. surface) needs were satisfied well enough...

  • in each part of the cycle;...

  • in a way that left each person feeling respected enough by...

  • themselves and...

  • all others involved.

        How does this compare to your definition of "an effective visitation"? If you co-parents haven't discussed and agreed on a common definition, doing so now is one way to start building visitation harmony. Notice your self talk now...

        Let's clarify some of these factors:

"... all involved kids and adults..." means the four or more people living regularly in the "sending" and "receiving" homes, not just the visiting child/ren. It may also include relatives or baby sitters who don't live in either home;

"... thoughtfully..." means each child and adult takes time to discern what they genuinely think and feel about the last visitation cycle before forming an opinion;

"... everyone's major primary needs..." This is the heart of successful visitations. It proposes that each adult and child involved has primary needs - like acceptance, respect, stimulation, security, and affection - underlying surface needs like "I need (you) to have a nice time." People who learned to be shamed and emotionally numb (wounded) as kids have a hard time (a) knowing their primary needs, (b) validating and asserting them, (c) empathizing with others' needs, and (d) discerning whether their own needs got met well enough or not. When such people are asked "How was your visitation?" they truly don't know how it was.

"... in each part of the cycle..." implies that each of the four or more people have a set of primary needs that may change at each of the 18 stages of the visitation process. One view of this is that your standard visitation cycle has almost 20 places where people's needs may not be met. A glass-half-full view is there are 18 places to improve your visitation process. For instance, a child may feel good about going to and being in their "second home," but feel rudely ejected or tearfully enmeshed when it's time to leave one or both homes. "I hate visitation" may really mean "I hate my emotions when I say goodbye."

"... in a way that..." means that the way each person got their primary needs met is just as important as the needs themselves. For example, getting a goodbye hug feels better if it's desired, spontaneous, and genuine, vs. getting hugged dutifully, coldly, and half-heartedly.

"... leaves each person feeling respected enough..." - the only person qualified to make that judgment is each individual adult and child. Feeling included, valued, considered, and appreciated (respected) enough are primary needs of each person at each step in the visitation process - though some may not be aware of those needs.

"... by themselves and all others involved." If there are six people involved in a visitation, each needs to feel respected enough by five others and themselves, for their visitation to feel effective. Premise: If any child or adult is shame-based (doesn't really respect themselves), the others' respect probably won't feel like enough.

        How do you feel about these ideas so far? How would each of your other co-parents feel? Each of the kids that shuttle between your co-parenting homes? If elements like these define child-visitation "success," then what prevents some co-parents (like you?) from achieving it consistently, or at all?

What's the (Surface) Problem?

        For 27 years, I've listened to hundreds of divorced and stepfamily co-parents describe their child-visitation conflicts as mixes of the complaints below. See if some of these are familiar...

"My ex mate won't cooperate / listen to reason / give in or compromise / empathize with our child's needs / apologize / respect my needs / keep me informed / set healthy boundaries and limits / provide reasonable consequences / provide consistent, appropriate caregiving / follow the legal parenting agreement / obey the legal Order of Protection / stop badmouthing me / stop harassing me / get appropriate medical or emotional help / problem-solve / protect our child from ______ / stop using chemicals / drive safely / keep his/her promises / be on time / stop using the kids as spies / appreciate my sacrifices and compromises /..." 

Implication: "Our visitation problems are my ex mate's fault, and I'm helpless, or forced to confront him/her. Or visitations are "a problem" because...

"My son/daughter doesn't like going to their (other parent's) home / spending time with (their other parent), / their stepparent; / the other child(ren) in that home; / all the complicated planning, packing, and traveling; / the rules in that house / adapting to a very different set of house rules than ours / leaving their pet / not having their own room over there / not having enough privacy / being left with a sitter over there / never doing fun stuff / being bored / being ignored / being used / being quizzed /..."  

Implication: "The people in the other house do things that make visitations painful, scary, unpleasant, or boring too often for my child(ren). It's their fault, and I'm helpless, or forced to confront them." Or visitations are stressful because...

"My (stepparent) mate says I'm being walked on by my ex / not protecting my child from my ex / giving too much time and energy to visitation issues / worrying more about my child(ren) than hers(his) / making too big a deal out of visitations / overreacting / too sensitive / too aggressive / too passive / too cooperative / still attracted to my ex / attached to my child at the hip / letting guilt run my life / overprotective / ignoring (my mate) when my child visits / ignoring my child when s/he visits / 'unnaturally close' to my child / inconsiderate /..." 

Implication - visitations are "no fun" because my partner criticizes me for my values and/or behavior, rather than filling my needs for empathy and encouragement. And people say visitations are a pain because...

Stepsiblings - fight / whine / complain / are too noisy / don't like each other / won't obey house rules / are too picky about food / gang up on each other / ignore each other / compete with each other / stay up too late / trash the house / are rude and disrespectful /..."

Implication - one or more kids 'cause our visitation problems; or...

Relatives - my [mother / father / mother in law / father in law / ex mother in law / ex father in law / (or other relative)] criticizes [me / my child(ren) / my present partner / my ex mate  / all of us] for [some visitation choices and behaviors] without  [understanding / listening / being asked for their opinion / empathizing / knowing the details / caring what I need or feel /...]

Implication - it's my relatives' fault that visitations are stressful.

A final group of surface visitation problems sounds like...

The lawyer(s) / judge / legal system / mediator - made this ridiculous schedule / is completely unreasonable / is totally biased / made us use this expensive psychological expert who said...  / forced us to see this counselor, who said .. / cost us thousands of dollars we don't have, to get (no solutions) / threatened me with... / won't stand up to my ex about... "

Implication - Our visitation problems are caused by the legal system, not us or me!  

        Did you see elements of your situation here? The average visitation conflict is a mosaic of these, with adults and kids in each home having different perceptions, priorities, and different sets of criticisms and complaints. I propose that none of these is the real problem!

        What do you notice about these reasons individually and all together? What I notice is the adults who cite these complaints (a) are critical of, and frustrated with one or more other people, and (b) deny, minimize, or justify their part in what causes their "visitation problems." I have rarely met a co-parent or couple who was aware of everyone's primary visitation needs, and knew how to problem-solve (satisfy) family-members' unmet visitation-needs effectively.

Continue with ideas on identifying and resolving your real (primary) visitation problems...
 

<<  Previous page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  / Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated June 02, 2008