The Web address of this article is
http://sfhelp.org/basics/erikson8.htm
Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational
popup, so please turn off
your brow-ser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit
Web site.
This is one of over 150 articles focused on healing
psychological
building
family relationships, breaking the [wounds + unawareness]
and
divorce. This intro-duction
describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its
resources. Each article is part of a
mosaic of ideas, so the more you
read, the more sense they'll all make. These articles augment, vs.
replace, other
professional help.
Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this -
what do you
+ + +
This page is a format-edit of, and commentary about, a 1997
Web series
on psychologist Erik Erickson's theory of psychosocial development,
The original authors
are Craig
Cramer, Bernadette Flynn, and Ann La Fave of the State University of New
York (SUNY) College at Cortland, NY.
Erikson's ideas were presented in his
classic 1963 book
Childhood and Society.
Main links in the table below connect with Web
commentary on each stage by the authors.
+++
"Erikson's theory consists of eight stages of development. Each stage is
characterized by a differ-ent conflict that must be resolved by the
individual. When the environment makes new demands on people, the conflicts
arise. 'The person is faced with a choice between two ways of coping with
each crisis, an adaptive, or maladaptive way.
Only when each crisis is
resolved, which involves a change in the personality, does the person have
sufficient strength to deal with the next stages of development'
(Schultz
and Schultz, 1987). If a person is unable to resolve a conflict at a
particular stage, they will confront and struggle with it later in life."
Dr. Erik Erickson's 8 Stages of Human Development
|
Stage |
Ages |
Basic
Conflict |
Important
Event |
Summary |
|
1.
Oral-Sensory |
Birth to
12 to 18 months |
Trust vs.
Mistrust |
Feeding |
The infant
must form a first loving, trusting relationship
with the caregiver,
or develop a sense of mistrust. |
|
2.
Muscular-Anal |
18 months
to 3 years |
Autonomy
vs.
Shame/Doubt |
Toilet training |
The child's energies
are directed toward the development of physical skills, including
walking, grasping, and rectal sphincter control. The child learns
control but may develop
and doubt if not handled well. |
|
3.
Locomotor |
3 to 6
years |
Initiative
vs.
Guilt |
Independence |
The child continues to
become more assertive and to take more initiative, but may be too
forceful, leading to
feelings. |
|
4.
Latency |
6 to 12
years |
Industry
vs. Inferiority |
School |
The child must deal
with demands to learn new skills or risk a sense of inferiority,
failure, and incompetence. |
|
5. Adolescence |
12 to 18
years |
Identity
vs.
Role confusion |
Peer
relation-ships |
The teenager must
achieve a sense of identity in occupation, sex roles, poli-tics, and
religion. |
|
6. Young Adulthood |
19 to 40
years |
Intimacy
vs.
Isolation |
Love
relation-ships |
The young adult must
develop intim-ate relationships or suffer feelings of isolation. |
|
7. Middle Adulthood |
40 to 65
years |
Generativity vs. Stagnation |
Parenting |
Each adult must find
some way to satisfy and support the next genera-tion. |
|
8.
Maturity |
65 to
death |
Ego
Integrity vs. Despair |
Reflection
on and acceptance of one's life |
The culmination is a
sense of oneself as one is, and of feeling fulfilled. |
Perspective
The reality that Erikson's ideas are still widely referred to and discussed
(and disputed) 40 years later suggests the relevance of his theory
to understanding and promoting human health and growth. In deciding if and how to validate and apply Erikson's theory,
consider these points:
Erikson
(1902 - 1994) studied Sigmund Freud's ideas, and
was a stepson and a psychologist. His
childhood history
suggests he was probably a
long before the concept became debated.
His premises were developed
before the widespread acceptance of
theories.
Major implications of this include...
-
His ideas focus on the individual, and
do acknowledge (elsewhere) the powerful effect of the young
child's family
on his/her development - though
Erikson was (presumably) unaware of the
inherited effects of the toxic [wounds + unawareness)
-
I don't know whether Erikson proposed that
a child's success or failure to master these stages is directly
proportional to their caregivers' mastery of the same stages;
-
Since Erikson's ideas originated before
the advent of the current U.S. divorce
epidemic and the related surge in American stepfamily formation,
I suspect his writings do not comment on
minor kids' needs to master these family
adjustment needs in order to master the
eight stages of psy-chosocial growth.
Erikson's stages (above)
make
no reference to normal human
(vs. religion) as an integral part of healthy human development.
This probably reflects his Era's psychiatric convention of
excluding spirituality from treating human (vs.
family) dysfunction.
The
eight stages don't acknowledge...
-
the normal evolution of an
"inner-family" system of
in response to childhood family and social environments, or...
-
the widespread mid-life adult need to
harmonize these subselves under
the wise leadership of the resident
.
Erikson's generation of clinicians were trained several
decades before the inner-child and dissocia-tive disorder (e.g. "multiple
personality") concepts were validated and integrated into
clinical and lay awarenesses.
These eight stages can be misleading if they're interpreted to mean that they
are linear, discrete events, rather than
an overlapping flow of ongoing organic processes, It would be useful
to know if Erikson proposed specific criteria for assessing a
person's mastery of each developmental "crisis." For perspec-tive,
see these
wound-assessment worksheets.
The table above suggests that mastering each developmental "crisis" is
either successful or not, rather than proposing degrees of
success.
The authors quote a source (Schultz and Schultz) which suggests
Erikson thought that human de-velopment is a series of "adaptive or
maladaptive" ways of coping with each developmental conflict or
"crisis." One way of interpreting this using the
is that "maladaptive" ways are caused by well-meaning
(a "false self") who distrust and
the
and other
subselves.
There seems to be a loose correlation between these stages and some
of the six psychological
proposed in this Web site - e.g. excessive
(stage 1),
(stage 2) and
(stage 3). Stage 6 (intimacy vs. isolation) implies the
developmental conflict is learning to
(attach) and risk true intimacy (trust) with selected other people.
My perception is that healthy reciprocal bonding must
first develop in infancy with primary nurturers.
If that doesn't
happen because caregivers
significant childhood neglect,
genuine (vs. pseudo) bonding in adult
life is unlikely. Symptoms of this include
relationships, one or more di-vorces, an
inability to genuinely attach to (vs. need) children, and/or never
committing to a primary rela-tionship.
A fundamental question posed by Erikson's scheme is whether an adult who
has not "successfully resolved" one or more early developmental
conflicts can proactively "redo" the conflict-resolution process and
create a more "adaptive" outcome.
My and my
IFSA colleagues' consistent clinical experience
is that such
"redoing"
is feasible using
("parts work") to
the resident true Self to
and harmo-nize other subselves. Requisites for
this seem to be...
-
accumulating ~35-45 years' life
experience and...
-
hitting some form of
which causes...
-
commitment to improve personal
The alternative "maladaptive"
(false-self) choice is
overfocusing on immediate comforts, and
self-
This promotes
illness, social stress,
premature death, and unconsciously passing the
toxic [wounds + unawareness]
on to descendents.
Erikson's proposed growth stages imply that
(healthy) human development...
-
requires mastering a series of
interactive "conflicts" over time, and...
-
continues across each
person's whole life span, not just childhood.
This parallels the
premise that relationships and
pass
through a series of developmental
stages or phases across time as members age and negotiate their
dynamic mosaics of individual growth stages.
Status Check: Review the eight stages
in the table above, and then pause, breathe, and reflect.
On a scale
of 1 (I totally agree) to 10 (I totally disagree), how do you rank
your acceptance of Erikson's growth "crises" applied to yourself
and other important adults and kids? If you
disagree, how would you describe your theory of human development?
If you feel Erikson's scheme is credible, thoughtfully decide
whether you feel you made an "adap-tive" choice with the
conflict in each stage (so far). Then reflect on what you and any
family adults need to do to help any dependent kids master
each stage successfully, over time.
Recap
This article summarizes psychologist
Erik Erikson's widely accepted premise that human growth occurs
across
eight discrete stages that each person must negotiate across their life. Based on these premises, this
article offers perspective on these stages, in the
context of childhood
personality
and false-self
Erikson's theory was formed well before...
-
the present widespread clinical
acceptance of
theory as an effective way to
understand human development and behavior, and before...
-
current ideas about human
dissociation became known
and validated.
For perspective, note these
normal
developmental and typical
family-adjustment needs that typical
kids of divorce and parental re/marriage need to fill with empathic,
knowledgeable adult help.
+ + +
Pause, breathe, and reflect - why did you read this article? Did you
get what you needed? If not, what
you need? Who's
these questions - your
or
