Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents

Traits of a High-nurturance Organization

Are You Participating in One Now?

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW

HRbrass.gif (3108 bytes)

  • home > site overview > site map, directory, or search > Q&A, Project 1 links, Solutions article, or prior page > here

The Web address of this article is http://sfhelp.org/basics/hi-n-org.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.

        This is one of over 150 articles focused on healing psychological wounds,  building high-nurtur-ance family relationships, breaking the [wounds + unawareness] cycle, and preventing divorce. This introduction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make. These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help.

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        This is one of 12 checklists you can use to assess whether you or another person are ruled by a well-meaning false self. If you or they are, that will relentlessly degrade your life in key ways until you choose to work at personal recovery. The 12 checklists aim to offset a false self's protective drive to deny, repress, and minimize scary realities like major psychological wounds and what they mean.

Perspective

        Would you agree that people form groups to fill key personal and social needs? Nurturing means "need-filling." Organizations that fill their members' key needs well can be called "high nurturance." People raised in high-nurturance families tend to work in high-nurturance organizations, and vice versa.

        If you work in a low nurturance setting (where people often don't get key needs met), that may indicate that you survived a low-nurturance childhood, and have two to six significant psychological wounds

. If so, until you work proactively to reduce them, they will degrade your health, relationships, and productivity, and put your kids at risk of inheriting similar psychological wounds.

        High-nurturance organizations (including families) have common traits, compared to lower-nurturance organizations. I propose the following summary of such traits from...

  • 17 years' experience working as a systems engineer and sales representative to scores of average (for-profit) businesses,

  • 29 years' experience studying relationship and family health,

  • seven years' experience working on the Board of a large suburban non-profit mental-health center, and...

  • recovering from my own false-self wounds since 1986.

        This worksheet provides...

  • a summary of 30 common traits of high-nurturance organizations, and...

  • a summary of key options if you conclude you work in a low-nurturance setting.

        Before evaluating your work setting, take a...
 

  Status Check

        This non-profit educational Web site is based on some key premises. See how they compare to what you believe. In the following, T = "true, I agree; F = "false, I disagree;" and ? = "I'm not sure, or it depends on _____."

        1)  Families exist to fill the primary needs of their adults and kids. Some fill these needs (nurture) better than others. Thus any family - like yours - can be judged on a scale from "very low nurturance" to very high nurturance." (T  F  ?)

        2)  People raised in low-nurturance childhoods usually...

  • develop protective " false selves" (disorganized personalities) to survive. False selves cause (a) up to six psychological wounds in adults and kids, which cause (b) mixes of typical behavioral symptoms. (T  F  ?); and they...

  • often choose human-service occupations like education, law, counseling, clergy, medicine, customer service, consulting, etc.  (T  F  ?); and typical low-nurturance survivors...

  • tend to work in low-nurturance organizations which inhibit their recovering from any false-self wounds. (T  F  ?)          

        3)  Non-family organizations exist to fill the primary needs of (a) the people they serve, (b) their employees and volunteers, and (c) their regulators, funders, and donors. Any organization can be rated between very low-nurturance to very high, depending on how well they fill the primary needs of these two or three groups (in someone's opinion). (T  F  ?)

        4)  The nurturance-level of an organization is directly proportional to how wounded and unaware the group's policy-makers and leaders are. Leaders with... 
  • few false-self wounds,

  • adequate knowledge of relationship and organization skills, and...

  • accurate perceptions of members' and clients' or customers' primary needs...

...tend to evolve high-nurturance (effective) organizations. Conversely, significantly-wounded leaders tend to (a) attract and choose wounded, unaware members, and (b) evolve low-nurturance organizations.
(T  F  ?)

        5)  Co-workers in low and high-nurturance organizations each have characteristic behaviors. Members of low and high-nurturance families have similar behaviors. (T  F  ?)

        6)  People in true (vs. pseudo) recovery from false-self domination tend to (a) become dissatisfied with low-nurturance organizations, and they (b) seek higher-nurturance workplaces within their profession. Wounded people who aren't recovering tend to stay in low-nurturance settings despite major discomforts, or they change jobs frequently without gaining lasting satisfaction. (T  F  ?)

        7)  Right now I feel a mix of "light," grounded, alert, aware, alive, focused, calm, centered, purposeful, "up," confidant, strong, serene, "light," realistic, grounded, compassionate, resilient, and clear. (T  F  ?) These are symptoms that your personality is currently guided by your true Self. If you don't feel some mix of these now, your false self is apt to distort your answers below.

        Pause, and notice what you're thinking and feeling.

        Now put these premises to work:

  • On a scale of 1 (very low nurturance) to 10 (very high nurturance), I'd rate my childhood family as a ___.

  • On the same 1-10 scale, I'd rate the nurturance-level of my current workplace or school as a ___.

  • On a scale of 1 (I'm very wounded psychologically) to 10 (I'm wholistically healthy and have no significant wounds), I feel I'm now a ___ .

        Now use your beliefs to get a sense of the nurturance-level of your work setting. Set aside ~ 20" of undistracted time, and adopt the open mind of a student. Choose the attitude that anything you learn here can improve your and any dependents' lives.


  Common Traits of High-nurturance Organizations

       Premise: any organization that consistently fills the key needs of its members or workers, clients, and funders well enough will have many of the traits below.

        Check the items below you feel clearly apply to your work or school setting, or write a number from 1 (no) to 10 (yes). Don't check an item unless you can check each sub-item ("_") without ambivalence.

        Take your time to reflect on each item. Note that these traits apply to classrooms, church congregations, neighborhoods, sports teams, and volunteer organizations if you change "co-worker" to "group member."

__ 1)  All co-workers are _ clear enough on their organization's main goals and policies, and _ respect them well enough. _ Leaders' behaviors consistently match and promote these goals and policies. __ 2)  All co-workers feel their organization's executives, managers, and supervisors are effective enough in their job roles. This includes goal-setting, planning, delegating, evaluating, problem-solving, deciding, supporting, coaching, coordinating, confronting, and appreciating.
__ 3)  All co-workers feel steady personal _ pride in and _ concern for _ themselves, _ each other, and _ the organization. __ 4)  All co-workers feel _ genuine self-respect and _ respect the equal rights and worth of each other enough, despite personal differences.
__ 5)  Each co-worker knows clearly _ who they work for in the organization, _ what their main job responsibilities are, and _ how their performance is evaluated. __ 6)  Each co-worker usually feels _ their job is worthwhile enough, _ satisfying enough, and _ uses their talents and abilities well enough.
__ 7)  Within limits, professional "mistakes" and "failures" are usually seen as important chances to grow, vs. reasons to blame, ridicule, and shame. __ 8)  Co-workers usually feel they're _ well trained enough and _ have enough resources to perform the roles they've accepted.
__ 9)  All co-workers feel that written and verbal communication among all levels of the organization is effective enough. __ 10)  Co-workers steadily share a sense of teamwork  and common purpose, vs. jealousy, antagonism, resentments, and insecurities.
_ 11)  All co-workers are effectively coached to  do win-win problem-solving, vs. arguing, fighting, blaming, defending, and/or avoiding. _ 12)  Co-workers are _ encouraged to propose responsible improvements to the organization, and _ are recognized well enough for doing so.
_ 13)  Co-workers share a high level of _ self and _ mutual trust. This promotes inner and mutual honesty; there are no major secrets, denials, or taboos (e.g. "We don't talk about that!") _ 14)  When significant organizational changes occur, all co-workers feel they _ got enough notice, _ understand the changes and how they'll affect them, and _ have had enough opportunity to ask questions of, or make suggestions to, appropriate people.
_ 15)  Co-workers feel they have adequate chances to discuss and resolve confusions and conflicts over money, fringe benefits, and working conditions. _ 16)  All co-workers are comfortable enough with the organization's boundaries between professional and personal life.
_ 17)  Co-workers are encouraged to balance   work, rest, and play, and see all three as equally valuable to their job performance and their organization's success. _ 18)  Managers and workers generally respect each other as equally-valuable people and professionals, rather than feeling antagonistic, biased, or competitive.
_ 19)  Co-workers generally feel the management balances the needs of _ employees or members, _ clients, and _ funders well enough. _ 20)  Co-workers _ feel safe in asking for help in resolving local problems, and _ usually do so, rather than being overwhelmed or ineffective. 

_ 21)  Co-workers share realistic (vs. idealistic) optimism and hopes; A general spirit of "Let's try!" and "I / You / we can!" prevails

_ 22)  All levels of co-workers often exchange genuine, spontaneous, encouragements, affirmations, and appreciations (praise).
_ 23)  Co-workers are trained and encouraged to_ accurately assess clients' primary (vs. surface) needs, and _ factor those into the services that they provide.   _ 24)  Co-workers _ understand what they need to do to advance in the organization and profession, and feel _ encouraged enough to grow personally and professionally.
_ 25)  All co-workers value _ learning and _ change , vs. fearing, resisting, avoiding, or minimizing them. _ 26)  Co-workers share genuine interest in how their organization affects the local _ community and _ ecological environments, and are _ proactive in improving these, within reason.
_ 27)  The organization and its leader/s, services, and employees are well respected in local and professional communities. _ 28)  Co-workers on all levels display most of these high-nurturance behaviors relative to their workplace, most of the time.
_ 29)  Co-workers _ share a spirit of balanced service to themselves, each other, and other living things; and _ appreciate those who serve them. _ 30)  Managers and supervisors _ receive adequate training and coaching on how to be effective leaders, and _ they get enough constructive feedback on their abilities.
_ 31)  (add your own traits)

 

 

_ 32)

        Note your reaction to what you just read...

  • I feel that together, these traits are a reliable-enough way to judge the nurturance-level or wholistic health of any organization or group. (T  F  ?)

  • From 1 (very low) to 10 (very high), I'd rate the nurturance-level of the organization I work or study in as a ___.

  • Now I feel the odds that I have significant false-self wounds are about ___ %.

  • My true Self is responding to these items now. (T  F  ?)
     

Now What?

         This and 11 related checklists exist to help you decide if you have significant false-self wounds that are lowering the quality and length of your life, and jeopardizing any dependent kids. Recall why you read this, and then consider these options...

Do nothing with these results, or postpone acting on them;

Decide to use more of the checklists to widen your awareness;

Increase your perspective by evaluating the nurturance level of your childhood and/or current family;

Learn more about your multi-part personality (inner family), and/or review these typical questions about normal subselves;

Review this comparison of the traits of your true Self and a protective false self;

Study this introduction to personal recovery from false-self wounds;

Read and reflect on these ideas on healthy and toxic spiritual and religious beliefs, churches, and spiritual or religious communities and denominations;

Show this worksheet to someone else, and/or discuss the concepts and results with them;

Scan these representative books about recovery from low-nurturance childhoods to get an idea of what's available; or...

Identify specifically why you're working at the organization you are, now; or...

Invest in the Project-1 guidebook Who's Really Running Your Life?, or...

Browse the Project-1 site links, or...

Do something else.

+ + +

<<  This article was very helpful   somewhat helpful   not helpful   >>  

<<  Prior page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  September 19, 2008