Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and protect your descendents

Options for Relating to
Wounded People
- p. 1 of 2

Satisfy your needs - within limits

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW

colorbar 

The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/basics/wounded.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your brow-ser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.

        This is one of over 150 articles focused on healing psychological wounds, building high-nurtur-ance family relationships, breaking the [wounds + unawareness] cycle, and preventing divorce.

        This introduction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make. These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help.

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        Premises - typical kids raised in a low-nurturance environment survive by evolving a personality composed of many specialized subselves or parts. This usually results in two to six psychological wounds, which hinder healthy development and social functioning.

        The effects of these wounds range from minor to severe. Divorce is a sign of significant [wounding + unawareness] - and over 50% (i.e. mil-ions) of typical U.S. couples divorce legally or psychologically.

Contents

        This two-page article offers perspective and options for relating to a significantly-wounded adult or child. It covers...

  • required readings

  • perspective on...

    • six common psychological wounds

    • four typical wound-effects

    • how to tell if someone is "significantly wounded"

  • a status check on your understanding

  • reasons to change your attitudes about and responses to wounded people;

  • four general options for reacting to a significantly-wounded person;

  • examples of each major option; and...

  • response-options for five special relationships.

        If you're curious or skeptical about your personality subselves, get undistracted and read this letter to you. Then try this safe, interesting experience. If you're still skeptical, you may be dominated by a well-meaning false self.

Foundations

        This article assumes you're familiar with these ideas...

Perspective

        Let's set the stage by briefly exploring the six psychological wounds, their effects, and their common symptoms.

About Psychological Wounds

        My experience as a family-systems therapist with over 1,000 average Midwestern-U.S. adults sug-gests that over ~75% of typical U.S. men and women have survived significant childhood neglect and abuse ("trauma"). The high majority of them don't (want to) know this or what it means to them and their descendents.

        One universal meaning is that to survive, typical kids instinctively evolve a multi-talented false self. This inhibits the development of the resident true Self, and causes up to five interactive psychological conditions ("wounds"): excessive... 

  • shame ("low self esteem") and guilts;

  • fears of the unknown, abandonment, failure, overwhelm, pain, and success;

  • reality distortions - like denying, repressing, idealizing, exaggerating, minimizing, catastrophizing, rationalizing, intellectualizing, projecting, discounting, and numbing; and...

  • trusting other people too easily and getting repeatedly betrayed; or chronically distrusting yourself, reliable other people, and a benign Higher Power. And some trauma-survivors suffer...

  • an inability to bond with (care about) some or all living things, and be unable to feel, give, and receive love. The clinical label for this tragic condition is Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD).

        Once adults hit bottom and honestly admit their wounds, they can choose to reduce them. Over time, this can significantly improve their health and relationships, and help to protect their descen-dents and other people from the epidemic [wounds + unawareness] cycle.  

Typical Wound Effects

        Typical Grown Wounded Children (GWCs) are unaware of (a) several key topics, and (b) a dominant false self; so they...

  • have chronic trouble filling primary needs, and thinking, communicating, and problem-solving effectively; and they...

  • risk making up to three unwise courtship choices and later divorcing legally or psychologically. And typical GWCs...

  • may have trouble admitting and grieving losses (broken bonds) and promoting a pro-grief family;

  • risk passing on the toxic [wounds + unawareness] cycle to their vulnerable descendents; and...

  • suffer chronic health and emotional problems, and may die prematurely

To make this more real, study this real-life example of how these combined false-self wounds can affect family relationships.

Wound Symptoms

        Though personalities and backgrounds are unique, people often ruled by a protective false self have common behavioral and emotional traits. For a quick assessment, see this comparison of common true-Self and false-self behaviors, and these common emotional symptoms. Use the latter as a quick check to sense who's guiding your subselves at any time - like right now.

        Because childhoods aren't "perfect," most (all?) adults and kids have some wounding. Generally, wounds are significant if they cause chronic stress, unhappiness, and ill health - in someone's opinion. False selves will usually minimize and rationalize these problems until the person hits true bottom and breaks protective denials - often in mid-life. 

        Because typical false selves are apprehensive about being identified, they can cleverly disguise and discount behavioral wound-symptoms. In assessing yourself for significant wounds, guard against this distortion by using all 12 of these Project-1 worksheets - ideally with clear feedback from people who know you well and will be honest with you. 

        When you assess someone, stay aware that we wounded people regard our (toxic) traits, attitudes, and behaviors as normal. Before effective wound-reduction ("recovery"), we GWCs can't imagine what it would feel like to have our wise true Self (capital "S") consistently  guiding our inner team of subselves.

Status Check

        See how you feel about the ideas you just read. T = true, F = false, and “?” means “I don’t know” or "I'm not sure."

  • I can clearly describe (a) personality subselves, (b) true Self and false selves, and (c) psychologi-cal wounds, to another adult now. (T  F ?)

  • I accept that all adults and kids have teams of normal personality subselves without being "crazy," "defective," "psycho," or "mentally ill." (T  F ?)

  • I know how to (a) identify my subselves and (b) how to harmonize them - or I'm motivated to learn these now. (T  F ?)

  • I (a) can define "nurturance," and I agree that any family (like ours) can be rated “very low nurtur-ance” to “very high nurturance;” and (b) I have studied the traits that determine the nurturance level of any home. (T  F ?)

  • The adults who raised me didn't know these ideas or what they meant. (T  F ?)

  • My true Self (capital "S") is answering these questions - or if not, I know who is. (T  F ?)

        For more information, see these Project-1 Web articles and worksheets and the related guidebook Who's Really Running Your Life? (Xlibris.com, 2002; 2nd ed.)

Why Change?

        Relating well-enough with a significantly-wounded adult (GWC) or child can be hard - specially if you're wounded too. Typically, such relationships are frustrating, conflictual, and studded with anxieties, guilts, hurts, angers, distrust, disappointments, and disrespect.

        If the wounded person is someone you live or work regularly with, you can't avoid stressful inter-actions with them. A common least-effort response is denial and/or repression, and pretending "things are fine" - when they're not. The high cost of that strategy is usually loss of self-respect.

        Other common responses are endless arguments, confrontations, insults, whining, pleading, threats, ultimatums, and attacks, and hoping fruitlessly the other person will want to change. These lose-lose choices usually result from ignorance and lack of awareness.

       So the payoff for (a) recognizing significantly-wounded people and (b) learning how to react to them is notably less frustration and upset, and more satisfaction, serenity, and self-respect. If the wounded person is a member of your home and family, a major motivation to learn is protecting your minor kids from inheriting similar wounds, within local limits.

        You may also care about a wounded person but seldom interact with them, like the child or relative of a good friend. If you choose to intervene, your motivation may be to be a "good person." In such cases, beware of...

  • offering help which isn't wanted or requested, and...

  • taking responsibility for someone else's life and pain.

Both are inherently disrespectful, and rarely satisfy both person's primary needs for long.  

        So if you choose to - or must - relate to a significantly-wounded adult or child, what are your op-tions?

Prepare to Change

        Therapists Steve and Carol Lankton wisely suggest "If you always do what you've always done - you'll always get what you've always got." This implies that to manage your relationship with significant-ly-wounded people effectively, you must want to change some familiar attitudes and comfortable behav-iors. The unpleasant reality is that your attitudes and actions may unintentionally encourage some of the other person's noxious behaviors.

 Who Runs Your Life?

        An essential first step is admitting that you may often be dominated by a false self (wounded). Two common (false-self) defenses are denial ("I'm not wounded!") and minimizing ("Nah, my wounds are minor.") A third is "I've already healed my psychological wounds well enough." A fourth non-strategy is thinking and saying "Yeah, I'm pretty wounded." but not really meaning it or wanting to do anything about it. 

        To assess yourself for significant wounding, follow these steps honestly - ideally with the help of one or more people who...

  • understand and accept personality subselves and false-self wounds;

  • are usually guided by their true Self,

  • know you well, and...

  • will give you honest feedback, even if painful.

If you don't know anyone like this, consider hiring a veteran "parts work" therapist.

        When your Self is solidly guiding your life, the next preparation step is to examine your attitude about irritating, frustrating, and obnoxious adults and kids.  

Convert Your Attitudes

        A common reaction to people who cause us local or chronic discomfort - or who don't act "like they should" (by our standards) - is to label them bad, wrong, evil, insensitive, stupid, selfish, arrogant, abu-sive, dishonest, dumb, childish, immature, pathetic, gross, worthless, irresponsible, bitchy, idiotic, sleazy, low class, hopeless, retarded, controlling, crude, manipulative, egotistical, unreliable, bigoted, criminal, addicted, spacey, weak, a loser, failure, or wimp; etc.

        Do you ever think or speak labels like these about people you dislike and/or are offended by? If so, (a) you're probably governed by a critical false self, and (b) the other person probably senses your sub-selves' disrespectful (1-up) attitudes whether you're vocal or silent. That will steadily provoke hurt, resen-tment, hostility, defensiveness, distrust, anger, avoidances, and c/overt counterattacks until you change.

        Change to what?

        When you're steadily guided by your true Self, an instinctive reaction to GWCs in denial ("ob-noxious people") is compassion. That does not mean you must tolerate their stressful behaviors or agree with their values and opinions. It means you regard their needs, personal rights, and human dignity (worth) as being as valid as your own.

       Try this out now. Picture or think of an obnoxious adult or child, and recall how you usually judge their behaviors, attitudes, or traits. Now picture this person as being swathed with bloody bandages, hobbling painfully with a heavy leg-cast and crutches.

        Try saying "(Name) is really wounded. S/He didn't cause the wounds, and doesn't know what to do about them." Do any of your inner voices (subselves) balk at this compassionate point of view? ("Yes, but...") If so, try to identify who they are, and interview them one at a time to find out why they object to compassion. Reassure them it does not mean you have to endure a wounded person's unpleasant traits or behaviors, and then demonstrate this...

Response Options

        Keep your favorite obnoxious person in mind as you read this...

        Four basic options with any wounded adult and child are (a) scorn, judge, and complain about them; (b) repress your feelings and needs (choose a victim or martyr role); (c) compassionately tolerate them within local limits, or (d) identify and respectfully assert your needs with them. Which is your preferred strategy so far?

        The last strategy requires that you first...

  Identify Your Primary Needs

        Focus on the GWC and identify objectively what bothers you about them. Three possibilities are some...

  • attitudes and values (e.g. approving of abortion, same-sex marriage, bigotry, fraud,...).

  • personality and/or physical traits, and/or some...

  • specific habits, mannerisms, and behaviors like cracking their knuckles, smoking, talking loudly, interrupting you, or chewing with their mouth open.

You can seek change in some of these, but not all of them. Once you define your needs, then...

  Choose Your Response

        You can't affect any physical factors like an annoying voice tone, cough, or laugh. You may get the wounded person to change some attitudes or traits by describing personality subselves and wound-recovery, and suggesting s/he'd be happier if s/he empowered her/his true Self to take charge. If you're empowering your Self to lead, you may describe that process and your results so far.

        If a GWC isn't ready to hit bottom and reorganize her/his personality, use these wise guidelines and settle for "planting the idea" of false-self wounds and recovery. You can also respectfully inform the person how their traits affect you and your relationship, without asking for change.

        You may be able to assert and motivate the wounded person to change some irritating or frustrating behaviors. Your odds are best if your and the other person's true Selves are steadily guiding you each.

Examples

        To make these response-options more real, let's illustrate them...

  Plant "Seeds"

       Here, "planting seeds" means watching for chances to objectively explain personality subselves, true and false selves, wounds, and wound-recovery; and then letting go of trying to control the wounded person's reaction to these ideas. Before "planting," review these ideas about offering respectful feedback to other people.

        Normal first-reactions to these ideas are disbelief, skepticism, rejection, and sometimes scorn ("That's just New Age psychobabble!"). Another common (false-self) response is acknowledging the credibility of these ideas ("Yeah, that makes sense, but..."), and vehemently denying that they apply to the person or their family.

        If you choose to plant these seeds, expect "resistance" - arguments, discounting, indifference, sus-picion, etc... Be alert for (a) preaching, (b) threatening ["If you don't  reduce your wounds (some awful thing will happen)]"; (c) using logic to persuade the GWC to assess for wounds; (d) labeling the other person, and (e) blaming them for not "taking responsible action."  These are all lose-lose choices.

        Be specially alert for feeling you must "save" the GWC. Assuming responsibility for an able adult's life and pain is inherently disrespectful, and may hinder them from needed healing and growth. Obsession with saving a wounded, unaware person suggests false-self control and relationship addic-tion (codependence). Excessive religious missionary zeal is a widespread example.

        An exception to this is wanting to protect someone's child from serious psychological wounds. See this for three powerful prevention options.

        Whether you plant seeds or not, another option you have in relating to "obnoxious' (wounded) adults and some kids is to...

   Give Respectful Feedback

        Some wounded adults and most kids aren't aware of, deny, minimize, or justify - the impacts of their irritating traits and behaviors. If they're shame-based (which is common), they'll dodge responsibility for these impacts ("That's not my fault!"). To maintain your self-respect and integrity, you can offer a fac-tual description of how the person's attitudes, traits, or behaviors affect you - without expecting them to agree or change.

        To raise your odds of being heard clearly, study this overview of effective assertion, and the powerful tool of assertive I-messages. Using the latter might sound like...

"Are you open to some feedback from me?" Be prepared for "No." If you get a nod or "Yes," then say something like...

"Nisha, when you interrupt me so often, I feel disrespected and frustrated, and I lose interest in talking with you."

"Jake, when you choose to swear often and talk so loudly, I feel distracted, and have trouble hearing what you're trying to say."

"Marla, the perfume you wear is so strong it distracts me from focusing on what we're talking about."

        Imagine how you'd react if someone gave you feedback like this, calmly and respectfully, with steady eye contact. Notice several things about these two-part "I-message" examples: they...

  • describe specific GWC behavior and specifically how it affects you;

  • are brief, clear, focused, and non-critical;

  • avoid apologizing, explaining, or generalizing ("you always / never...");

  • factually describe how the GWC's trait or behavior affects you; and they...

  • avoid sarcasm and judgmental labels; and...

  • omit any request or demand for change.

         The purpose of such factual feedback is not to cause guilt or change. It is to (a) give the GWC accurate information they might not get otherwise have, (b) leave them free to use it as they wish, (c) set the stage for asserting respectful limits, and (d) earn your own self-respect. It can also promote win-win problem-solving, if you're both open to that as partners.

       Continue reviewing general and special options for reacting to significantly-wounded people. Do you need a break first?

<<  Prior page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  September 27, 2008